Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday March 29 2020, @04:10AM   Printer-friendly
from the do-the-candidates-count? dept.

HBO's 'Kill Chain' doc highlights the flaws in US election machines:

While COVID-19 might be putting just about everything else on hold, we're still marching towards a presidential election later this year. After the high-profile interference of 2016, election security and foreign meddling are still critical issues, but many states still aren't doing enough to ensure the integrity of the process. A documentary premiering tonight on HBO proves a sobering reminder of the fragility of America's voting infrastructure.

While the matter is of grave concern across the country, Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America's Elections delves into problems with some specific machines and issues in certain states. For instance, back in 2005, security researcher Harri Hursti (a key figure in the film) demonstrated a memory card exploit that could alter votes on an optical scan voting machine. Those Diebold machines are still in operation in 20 states and are slated for use in November, the filmmakers note.

Elsewhere, a judge banned Georgia from continuing to use the vulnerable systems it had in place for well over a decade. In the wake of the contentious 2018 gubernatorial election, officials had new machines in place for this month's presidential primary. While the replacements can print paper ballots, which are important for proper vote auditing, they're still very much vulnerable as they run on Windows 7 -- for which Microsoft recently ended support.

We also hear from an Indian hacker who says he was able to gain full access to Alaska's system, including live voting data, during the 2016 presidential election. He claims he'd have been able to remove a candidate from the ballot or change any vote, but decided not to for fear of triggering some kind of alarm.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Monday March 30 2020, @04:03PM

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Monday March 30 2020, @04:03PM (#977257) Journal

    The mark will be very appalling^W appealing. You need to buy or sell. As the commercial says: don't leave home without it.

    Consider the appealing arguments for the mark:
    * it can't be stolen
    * it's now easy to track everyone's movements
    * track what they buy or sell (advertisers will love it)
    * it's easy to identify who has been vaccinated, or who isn't social distancing
    * it's easy to identify who is voting and who is disloyal
    * it's easy to identify who the dead bodies in the street are
    * it's eas(ier) to identify who is not missing and still shopping living

    People will disregard what the third angel says in verse 9 of Rev 14:6-13 [biblegateway.com]. People will say they don't believe fairy tales and take the mark to prove it. Thus making the words "prove it" ironic.

    If you can't afford the version of the mark that goes on your hand, then you can get a free version on your forehead which displays colored animated advertising banners, yet is recognized by all point of sale terminals and identity scanners.

    --
    The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2