Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday March 29 2020, @08:37PM   Printer-friendly
from the questionable-dependencies dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

In November 2019, Denis Pushkarev, maintainer of the popular core-js library, lost an appeal to overturn an 18-month prison sentence imposed for driving his motorcycle into two pedestrians, killing one of them.

As a result, he's expected to be unavailable to update core-js, a situation that has project contributors and other developers concerned about the fate of his code library.

Pushkarev, known as zloirock on GitHub, mentioned the possibility he may end up incarcerated in a thread last May discussing the addition of post-install ads to generate revenue for a project that so many use and so few pay for. He anticipated he may need to pay for legal or medical expenses related to his motorcycle accident.

In that thread, developer Nathan Dobrowolski asked, "If you are in prison, who will maintain [core-js] then?"

Pushkarev offered no answer. Since his conviction last October, the need to resolve that question has become more than theoretical.

-- submitted from IRC

So dear soylentil developers, are there any libraries you are depending on that have a single point of failure?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 30 2020, @06:56PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 30 2020, @06:56PM (#977310)

    Only Marxists make this type of grammar mistake; it is a sign of their mental confusion regarding sexes (not gender, which is a grammatical and not biological term).
    The correct pronoun to use in the general case where neither male nor female is specifically meant is: male.
    Barring that, just say, "the user."

  • (Score: 2) by Arik on Tuesday March 31 2020, @06:21AM

    by Arik (4543) on Tuesday March 31 2020, @06:21AM (#977536) Journal
    It's not a mistake.

    You're correct insofar as I was alternating genders, which is no the same thing as sex. But there's no mistake and no confusion.

    You're correct insofar as one possible, and in my view logical and unobjectionable approach is simply to default to the unmarked gender. Plenty of precedent, and as I said personally unobjectionable.

    But it's not the one true and only correct way. Language is more flexible than that. English in particular is more flexible than that. Some people find it objectionable. It's not a huge deal.

    Conspicuously alternating between the marked and unmarked form is almost precisely the same, except it gives an explicit cue as to which of two plausible ways it is to be read. In a sense, this is a better alternative, simply because it is less ambiguous.

    "Barring that, just say, "the user.""

    The proper English is "one." As in "when one finds oneself in a hole, one must first stop digging."
    --
    If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?