Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday March 31 2020, @03:12PM   Printer-friendly
from the I-forget-to-breathe dept.

Air pollution linked to dementia and cardiovascular disease:

The number of people living with dementia is projected to triple in the next 30 years. No curative treatment has been identified and the search for modifiable risk and protective factors remains a public health priority. Recent studies have linked both cardiovascular disease and air pollution to the development of dementia, but findings on the air pollution-link have been scarce and inconsistent.

In this study, the researchers examined the link between long-term exposure to air pollution and dementia and what role cardiovascular diseases play in that association. Almost 3,000 adults with an average age of 74 and living in the Kungsholmen district in central Stockholm were followed for up to 11 years. Of those, 364 people developed dementia. The annual average level of particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in width (PM2.5) are considered low compared to international standards.

"Interestingly, we were able to establish harmful effects on human health at levels below current air pollution standards," says first author Giulia Grande, researcher at the Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society at Karolinska Institutet. "Our findings suggest air pollution does play a role in the development of dementia, and mainly through the intermediate step of cardiovascular disease and especially stroke."

Journal Reference:

Giulia Grande, Petter L. S. Ljungman, Kristina Eneroth, Tom Bellander, Debora Rizzuto. Association Between Cardiovascular Disease and Long-term Exposure to Air Pollution With the Risk of Dementia. JAMA Neurology, 2020; DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4914


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Offtopic) by martyb on Tuesday March 31 2020, @07:46PM (4 children)

    by martyb (76) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday March 31 2020, @07:46PM (#977737) Journal

    The problem with the clean room approach is that it's wrong too - billions of years of evolution have taken place in a messy soup of bacteria, viruses, pollen, parasites, etc. Take those all away and lots of complex systems start to fail.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/19/magazine/the-parasite-underground.html [nytimes.com]

    Yes, and no.

    Growing up, I had my fair share of playing in sand and dirt, climbing trees, swimming in ponds and the ocean, running through fields of waist-high plants of who knows how many different species, etc. We had cats and dogs, too.

    On the other hand, as an example, glancing at the label of a convenient-to-me spray cleaner, I see this list of incredients:

    Alkyl (C12 40% C14 50% C16 10%) dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride: 0.3%
    Other Ingredients: 99.7%
    Total: 100%

    They use unconventional nomenclature but those percentage values for carbon are for isotopes. C12 (more properly, 12C is the most-commonly occurring isotope (98.9%). Next up is 13C which represent 1.1% of the naturally-occuring, stable isotopes (and which was not listed in the ingredients). All the other isotopes are radioactive and extremely rare in nature. 14C (better-known for its use in carbon dating) has a natural occurrence of 1 ppt (part per trillion). (For more info, see Wikipedia's entry on Isotopes of carbon [wikipedia.org].)

    Doing the math, this spray cleaner has 0.15% carbon 14... a darn sight more than 1 part per trillion.

    Okay, I can hear the argument that this is an extreme case, but is it? What about simple cleaners like bleach and ammonia? Good question.

    Here's some of what Wikipedia has to say about bleach [wikipedia.org]:

    Bleach is the generic name for any chemical product which is used industrially and domestically to clean, and to remove stains. It often refers, specifically, to a dilute solution of sodium hypochlorite, also called "liquid bleach".

    Many bleaches have broad spectrum bactericidal properties, making them useful for disinfecting and sterilizing and are used in swimming pool sanitation to control bacteria, viruses, and algae and in many places where sterile conditions are required. They are also used in many industrial processes, notably in the bleaching of wood pulp. Bleaches also have other minor uses like removing mildew, killing weeds, and increasing the longevity of cut flowers.

    Bleaches work by reacting with many colored organic compounds, such as natural pigments, and turning them into colorless ones. While most bleaches are oxidizing agents (chemicals that can remove electrons from other molecules), some are reducing agents (that donate electrons).

    Chlorine, a powerful oxidizer, is the active agent in many household bleaches. Since pure chlorine is a toxic corrosive gas, these products usually contain hypochlorite which releases chlorine when needed. "Bleaching powder" usually means a formulation containing calcium hypochlorite.

    Oxidizing bleaching agents that do not contain chlorine are usually based on peroxides such as hydrogen peroxide, sodium percarbonate, and sodium perborate. These bleaches are called 'non-chlorine bleach,' 'oxygen bleach' or 'color-safe bleach.'

    [...]Bleaches generally react with many other organic substances besides the intended colored pigments, so they can weaken or damage natural materials like fibers, cloth, and leather, and intentionally applied dyes such as the indigo of denim. For the same reason, ingestion of the products, breathing of the fumes, or contact with skin or eyes can cause health damage.

    And as for ammonia [wikipedia.org]:

    Although common in nature—both terrestrially and in the outer planets of the Solar System—and in wide use, ammonia is both caustic and hazardous in its concentrated form. It is classified as an extremely hazardous substance in the United States, and is subject to strict reporting requirements by facilities which produce, store, or use it in significant quantities.

    [...] Household ammonia is a solution of NH3 in water, and is used as a general purpose cleaner for many surfaces. Because ammonia results in a relatively streak-free shine, one of its most common uses is to clean glass, porcelain and stainless steel. It is also frequently used for cleaning ovens and soaking items to loosen baked-on grime. Household ammonia ranges in concentration by weight from 5 to 10% ammonia. United States manufacturers of cleaning products are required to provide the product's material safety data sheet which lists the concentration used.

    Beware of comparing "bacteria, viruses, pollen, parasites" with cleaning products.

    That all said, as with most things it is a matter of concentration. It is one thing to wander through a field of, say wheat. It is quite another to hang around in a just-loaded grain-elevator full of wheat.

    Looks like I went overboard there; whew! Sorry about that! (Being cooped up at home with this pandemic has thrown me off more than I realized!)

    So, sure let's NOT live in completely antiseptic bubbles, free of all potential pathogens! Some degree of challenge to one's immune system is okay and arguably necessary. But, let's be aware that cleaning products bring their own troubles to the table and may cause problems in their own right. The challenge is in trying to strike a balance between a "safe" level of natural "pests" and the cleaning products used to remove them. The devil is in the details.

    Inasmuch as living in squalor is not good for one's health, neither is living in a hyper-cleaned environment. The cleaning chemicals themselves have their own potential for causing harm, irrespective of what various the various "nasties" may bring to bear.

    --
    Wit is intellect, dancing.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   0  
       Offtopic=1, Interesting=1, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Offtopic' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Tuesday March 31 2020, @09:15PM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Tuesday March 31 2020, @09:15PM (#977780)

    I have to wonder: WTF do they care about the carbon isotope ratio in a cleaning chemical? Are they using it as a forensic tracer? Further, the cost of testing / controlling the isotope ratio would be insanely high as compared to any potential change in cleaning action the isotopes might have.

    I think, rather, it's a screwed up label.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by deimtee on Tuesday March 31 2020, @10:16PM (2 children)

    by deimtee (3272) on Tuesday March 31 2020, @10:16PM (#977812) Journal

    Alkyl (C12 40% C14 50% C16 10%) dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride: 0.3%

    You are reading the label wrong. The C12, C14 and C16 refer to the length of the carbon chain in the alkyl part of the molecule.
    CH3-Ch2.....-CH2-C(CH3)2NH3+ : Cl-

    If you actually had something tha was 10% 16C it would instantly explode and irradiate the area.

    --
    If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.
    • (Score: 5, Informative) by deimtee on Tuesday March 31 2020, @10:23PM (1 child)

      by deimtee (3272) on Tuesday March 31 2020, @10:23PM (#977816) Journal

      All that and I dropped the benzyl. Doh.

      CH3-CH2.....-CH2-C6(H2(CH3)2)-NH3+ : Cl-

      --
      If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.
      • (Score: 3, Touché) by martyb on Tuesday March 31 2020, @11:26PM

        by martyb (76) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday March 31 2020, @11:26PM (#977831) Journal

        Whoops! Thanks so much for the correction! It makes much more sense, now. High school AP chemistry was a looong time ago. Got a 5 on the advanced placement exam, which fulfilled my college chem requirement. Next up was organic chemistry which was described to me as "Here's a 3-inch (~7cm) book. Memorize it." Ummm, nope! So I stayed with computer science as I had originally intended. Thanks again for the correction!

        Please mod my original comment down as Overrated, too.

        --
        Wit is intellect, dancing.