T-Mobile, Sprint took a risk by finishing merger without Calif. approval:
California state regulators are trying to hold up the T-Mobile/Sprint merger, saying the companies don't yet have approval to combine their operations in the state.
T-Mobile and Sprint announced yesterday that the merger is a done deal and that the two companies are now one. But while the companies had almost all approvals from government authorities, they have not yet gotten the expected approval from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). The CPUC is scheduled to vote on the merger approval and related conditions on April 16.
In response to yesterday's T-Mobile/Sprint announcement, the CPUC issued a ruling that says the companies "shall not begin merger of their California operations until after the CPUC issues a final decision on the pending applications."
We contacted T-Mobile today about yesterday's CPUC ruling and will update this article if we get a response.
The state Public Utilities Code prevents companies from merging their California operations without approval, the CPUC order said. "Both Joint Applicants, T-Mobile and Sprint, have California subsidiaries that are public utility telephone corporations under state law, and subject to the jurisdiction of this agency. The merger of the companies' operations in California is therefore subject to CPUC approval," the order said.
But T-Mobile and Sprint argue that the CPUC does not have jurisdiction over wireless transactions and that the merger can be completed without the agency's approval. T-Mobile and Sprint previously received approval from the Federal Communications Commission and Department of Justice, and they defeated a lawsuit filed by California and other states that were trying to block the deal.
Regardless of the outcome at CPUC, the merger is happening. But the dispute between the companies and the Golden State could result in litigation and affect whether the state is able to impose conditions on the deal. T-Mobile claimed that some of CPUC's planned conditions are "practically impossible" and "unfair and discriminatory to T-Mobile vs our competitors."
T-Mobile warned investors that there is a "risk of litigation or regulatory actions" arising "from T-Mobile's consummation of the business combination during the pendency of the California Public Utility Commission's review of the business combination."
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 03 2020, @02:34PM (3 children)
This is all well and good balancing the role of State and Federal but you also have to remember that "Trump Replaced White House Pandemic-Response Team With Jared Kushner".
(Score: 3, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 03 2020, @02:37PM (1 child)
Yeah, but Jared is really smart. Did you know that he ties his own shoes, AND his own tie?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 03 2020, @04:34PM
What, he doesn't use tape on his tie?
No, I can't accept that(!!!), must be fake news.
(Score: 2) by epitaxial on Friday April 03 2020, @04:24PM
Other states have to pick up the slack because Uncle Sam is too fat and lazy to do his job. Like New York shutting down Jim Bakker's colloidal silver scam because the feds sure don't have a clue.