SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Senators raise privacy questions about Google's COVID-19 tracker:
Two US senators want to make sure Google's COVID-19 tracker isn't infringing on millions of people's privacy. In a letter sent to Google CEO Sundar Pichai on Tuesday, Sens. Ed Markey and Richard Blumenthal raised questions about how the tech giant's tracker is ensuring that the location data it's collecting and presenting stays confidential.
The Trump administration has called on tech companies to provide data for tracking the coronavirus pandemic, hoping that logs of people's locations can give insight on social distancing and the disease's spread. Location data has been used in South Korea and China to help contain and track COVID-19 cases, and the US government is looking to do the same as it deals with the pandemic.
[...] Last Friday, Google announced its own COVID-19 tracker, using location data it's collected from its millions of users to help health officials make policy decisions and measure social distancing effects.
The data is collected from people who have their Location History setting activated on their phones, which is typically off by default. In its announcement, the tech giant said no personally identifiable information is collected for this tracker.
Still, Markey, a Democrat from Massachusetts, and Blumenthal, a Democrat from Connecticut, have their concerns with Google using a massive amount of location data for tracking the outbreak.
The two lawmakers raised points about how researchers have easily de-anonymized location data several times, since the datasets are often tied to frequently visited spots like homes, workplaces and places of worship.
"Location data sharing carries with it myriad risks, and while we commend Google's efforts to assist in combatting the coronavirus pandemic, we caution you against steps that risk undermining your users' privacy," the senators wrote in the letter.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by BsAtHome on Wednesday April 08 2020, @10:42AM (1 child)
Yes, run, but leave your phone at home. Yes, run, but leave your fitness tracker at home. Yes, run, but leave your other smart gadgets at home.
There, how difficult was that?
The answer may be interpreted as a sarcastic view, but the most obvious and simple thing to do is often the hardest to do. If the whole situation should teach anything, then it should be that we can live without a lot of the "thingies" we were told we need. Pandora's box has been opened. You can close it by leaving its premise.
(Score: 3, Touché) by The Vocal Minority on Thursday April 09 2020, @05:41AM
I think Mr AC's point is that even if you do jettison all of your devices then bad luck, your habits, people you know, places you know and behavioural predilections are all already known. Should make tracking you down fairly easy, no?