Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday April 09 2020, @02:28PM   Printer-friendly
from the long-path-to-recovery dept.

Boeing making new 737 MAX software updates to address computer issue:

Boeing Co (BA.N) said late on Tuesday it will make two new software updates to the 737 MAX's flight control computer as it works to win regulatory approval to resume flights after the jet was grounded following two fatal crashes in five months.

The planemaker confirmed to Reuters that one issue involves hypothetical faults in the flight control computer microprocessor, which could potentially lead to a loss of control known as a runaway stabilizer, while the other issue could potentially lead to disengagement of the autopilot feature during final approach. Boeing said the software updates will address both issues.

The Federal Aviation Administration said on Tuesday it is in contact with Boeing as it "continues its work on the automated flight control system on the 737 MAX. The manufacturer must demonstrate compliance with all certification standards."

The largest U.S. planemaker has been dealing with a number of software issues involving the plane that has been grounded since March 2019. Boeing halted production in January. Boeing said it does not expect the issues to impact its current forecast of a mid-year return to service for the plane. Boeing said the new software issues are not tied to a key anti-software system known as MCAS faulted in both fatal crashes.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 10 2020, @05:58AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 10 2020, @05:58AM (#980764)

    Don't get me wrong, it is totally flyable without the MCAS. The problem is that the performance on paper, as that is the only experience I have with the MAX, is different then the nonMAX. Because it is too different, especially near stalls, they had two choices: require a new rating or somehow get it to perform like the nonMAXes. They chose the latter, which isn't surprising since the former would have cost them more money, possibly more than this may end up costing them after all this brouhaha.