Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday April 10 2020, @03:12AM   Printer-friendly
from the expensive-fireball dept.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/04/china-suffers-its-second-launch-failure-in-less-than-a-month/

The Long March 3B rocket is one of China's oldest active and most reliable boosters, with more than five dozen successful launches. On Thursday, however, the rocket failed when it attempted to launch an Indonesian telecommunications satellite, Nusantara Dua, from the Xichang Satellite Launch Center.

Although ground-based observations showed the first and second stages of the rocket performing nominally, apparently something went wrong with the final stage needed for a boost into geostationary transfer orbit. Chinese media reports indicate that the third stage failed due to unspecified reasons and that the 5.5-ton satellite fell back into Earth's atmosphere.

From a comment on the arstechnica article:
https://twitter.com/sybil_ms/status/1248253670476546048 (Picture of a fireball falling from the sky.)

Residents on Guam and Saipan heard a loud explosion and then debris falling from the sky. Homeland Security said it's the March 3B. Here is some video of what was seen pic.twitter.com/JqwWIK5Uxk
        — Ms Sybil Ludington (@sybil_ms) April 9, 2020


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 10 2020, @11:27AM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 10 2020, @11:27AM (#980782)

    The Chinese Communist Party is perfect and it is racist and stigmatizing to call their non-success a failure. As Nature explains: [nature.com]

    When the World Health Organization (WHO) announced in February that the disease caused by the new coronavirus would be called COVID‑19, the name was quickly adopted by organizations involved in communicating public-health information. As well as naming the illness, the WHO was implicitly sending a reminder to those who had erroneously been associating the virus with Wuhan and with China in their news coverage— including Nature. That we did so was an error on our part, for which we take responsibility and apologize.

    For years, it was common for viral diseases to be associated with the landscapes, places or regions where the first outbreaks occurred — as in Middle East respiratory syndrome, or Zika virus, named after a forest in Uganda. But in 2015, the WHO introduced guidelines to stop this practice and thereby reduce stigma and negative impacts such as fear or anger directed towards those regions or their people. The guidelines underlined the point that viruses infect all humans: when an outbreak happens, everyone is at risk, regardless of who they are or where they are from.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 10 2020, @03:12PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 10 2020, @03:12PM (#980826)

    Space forces in action?

    • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday April 10 2020, @04:26PM

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 10 2020, @04:26PM (#980849) Journal

      Forces like Dark Energy?

      Causing rockets to fail.

      --
      People today are educated enough to repeat what they are taught but not to question what they are taught.
  • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 10 2020, @11:34PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 10 2020, @11:34PM (#980939)

    WHO shouldn't have named it COVID-19. It reminds people that the virus came from China. COVID-19: China Originated Virus in December 2019.

  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Sulla on Friday April 10 2020, @11:45PM

    by Sulla (5173) on Friday April 10 2020, @11:45PM (#980942) Journal

    Also not allowed,
    SARS-nCoV-2

    Why you ask? What are the political ramifications of the people of China knowing they were attacked by another SARS virus?

    When it became known that 2019-nCoV was actually SARS-nCoV-2, why was it necessary to name it COVID-19?

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-51732042 [bbc.com]
    https://citizenlab.ca/2020/03/censored-contagion-how-information-on-the-coronavirus-is-managed-on-chinese-social-media/ [citizenlab.ca]
    https://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/asiapcf/east/05/14/sars.censor/ [cnn.com]

    Why has talking about SARS in China been censored since 2003?

    --
    Ceterum censeo Sinae esse delendam