Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday April 10 2020, @12:27PM   Printer-friendly
from the there's-a-hole-in-the-ozone-dear-Liza dept.

Scientists find another hole in the ozone layer, and this one's over the Arctic- Technology News, Firstpost:

Scientists have observed the opening up of a rare hole in the ozone layer above the Arctic. They attribute it to the unusually low temperatures in the atmosphere above the North Pole.

Scientists from the German Aerospace Center (DLR) found out about this ozone depletion using data from the Copernicus Sentinel–5P satellite.

The Copernicus programme is a collaboration between the European Space Agency, the European Commission, and other stakeholders.

"The ozone hole we observed over the Arctic this year has a maximum extension of less than 1 million sq. km. This is small compared to the Antarctic hole, which can reach a size of around 20 to 25 million sq. km with a normal duration of around three to four months," said Diego Loyola of the German Aerospace Center.

The Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service(CAMS) says that the last time a similar depletion of the ozone layer was observed over the Arctic was in spring 2011.
CAMS reveals that the depletion in 2020 seems to be stronger than the previous one.

The reports assert that while the development of ozone holes over the Antarctic every year during the Austral spring is a common phenomenon, such strong ozone depletion is not normally found in the Northern Hemisphere.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by quietus on Saturday April 11 2020, @01:46PM (1 child)

    by quietus (6328) on Saturday April 11 2020, @01:46PM (#981113) Journal

    Ever read a newspaper article about the line of work you're in? Why do you expect any better quality in reporting for science?

    Most of media today, and historically, is an emotion machine. Emotions do not thrive on nuanced qualifiers or probability estimates; for science, however, they're core.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by PiMuNu on Monday April 13 2020, @08:23AM

    by PiMuNu (3823) on Monday April 13 2020, @08:23AM (#981882)

    I was being sarcastic...

    ps: I am a scientist.