Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Sunday April 12 2020, @09:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the Cover-of-darkness dept.

China's devious move under cover of virus

As outbreaks debilitate the US navy, there are fears China may be using the coronavirus pandemic as cover for asserting control over the South China Sea.

A Vietnamese fishing boat has been rammed and sunk. Military aircraft have landed at its artificial-island fortresses. And large-scale naval exercises has let everyone know China's navy is still pushing the boundaries, hard.

Meanwhile, the USS Theodore Roosevelt aircraft carrier strike group has retreated from the contested waterway in an unscheduled return to Guam – with hundreds of cases of COVID-19 on board.

China's Peoples Liberation Army knows this presents an opportunity.

"The outbreak of COVID-19 has significantly lowered the US Navy's warship deployment capability in the Asia-Pacific region," an article on its official website declares.

The website insists not a single one of its soldiers, sailors or pilots had contracted COVID-19. Instead, the crisis had served to strengthen the combat readiness and resolve of the Chinese military.

That has international affairs analysts worried that even a short-term withdrawal of US and international from the East and South China Seas could give Beijing the opportunity it has been waiting for.

"I think China is exploiting the US Navy's coronavirus challenges to improve its position in the South China Sea by giving the appearance it can and will operate there at will while the US is hamstrung," former Pacific Command Joint Intelligence Centre director Carl Schuster told CNN.

Previously:
(2020-01-09) China Initiates Conflict with Indonesia in the South China Sea
(2019-12-21) Malaysian Top Envoy: China's 'Nine-Dash Line' Claim 'Ridiculous'
(2019-11-22) US Warships Sail in Disputed South China Sea Amid Tensions
(2019-05-14) China Builds New Type 002 Mega Carrier as the Age of Sea Power Wanes
(2018-05-13) China Begins Sea Trials for its First Domestically Developed Aircraft Carrier
(2017-12-24) World's Largest Amphibious Plane in Production Takes Flight in China
(2017-05-25) US Warship Challenges China's Claims in South China Sea
(2017-04-26) China Launches Aircraft Carrier
(2017-03-14) Japan to Send its Biggest Warship to the South China Sea
(2017-01-13) Chinese State Media Boasts About its New Electronic Reconnaissance Ship
(2016-07-14) China's South China Sea Claims Rejected By "Binding" but Unenforceable Tribunal Ruling


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2020, @11:02PM (7 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 12 2020, @11:02PM (#981739)
    And what, pray tell, is the problem with letting trans people serve in the military? If they can do the job that is asked of them, then that should be all that matters. A person's personal life is none of the military's business (it's in general none of any employer's business) unless that personal life interferes with the performance of their duties. It's hard to argue that an average trans person's personal life is really any more disruptive to their duties than an average straight person's personal life. The military long ago stopped caring whether some of the people serving under it were black. Some black people have the qualifications to serve, so serve they do. So too with women. Some women have the qualifications to serve, and do. What's the difference when it's a trans person? Is there something about being trans that inherently makes them unfit to serve in the military?
    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +3  
       Troll=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=2, Total=9
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2, Flamebait) by PartTimeZombie on Sunday April 12 2020, @11:50PM

    by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Sunday April 12 2020, @11:50PM (#981753)

    Trans people are different to me, and different is scary. I don't like being scared.

    Besides, Alex Jones said they're bad, and he wouldn't lie would he?

  • (Score: 2, Flamebait) by Runaway1956 on Monday April 13 2020, @04:29AM (5 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Monday April 13 2020, @04:29AM (#981824) Journal

    Trannies, like everyone else, know that becoming a member of the US military entitles them to certain levels of healthcare. Trannies regard their very expensive transiting treatments as healthcare. In their eyes, it becomes the military's responsibility to turn them into the opposite gender. In reality, they have a preexisting condition which should disqualify them from serving. If a heart murmur is sufficient to prevent a person from serving, then being the wrong gender should also disqualify.

    The constitution makes reference to "common defense" as a reason to have a military. There is no reference to "common gender" or whatever the hell.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 13 2020, @04:55AM (3 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 13 2020, @04:55AM (#981835)

      If the only way to obtain affordable healthcare is to work for a government department, that seems to suggest more about the appalling disparity of US healthcare than being trans.

      And yet if Bernie proclaims universal affordable healthcare as a basic human right as enjoyed in western countries such as the Nordics, he's branded a loony red. Go figure.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 13 2020, @01:19PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 13 2020, @01:19PM (#981942)

        I want to be pretty, the taxpayers should cover it. Go bernie go! Cover my elective cosmetic procedure at the taxpayer's expense. Not having people fawning over me is bad for my emotional health. I don't even feel my body is my own, I'm beautiful in my mind: Who is this ugly person staring back from the mirror. Boob job, nose job, lipo, face lift! Stat!

      • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 13 2020, @01:22PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 13 2020, @01:22PM (#981944)

        Removing your balls so that you can better pretend to be female is not a health care issue - it's a psychiatric issue.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 16 2020, @09:43PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 16 2020, @09:43PM (#983799)

        And if so, why then are the white-right so against universal healthcare for all their aryan brethren?

        Could it be they just see other whites as 'white niggers' to be dealt with when the black and brown, slanty eyed, and sand niggers are all taken care of? Will you be the first when they find out you have Irish blood?

        Americans are only happy when they are stupid, and that is a lot of the time. Which makes it easy for the less stupid among them to take advantage.

    • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 13 2020, @01:52PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 13 2020, @01:52PM (#981959)

      Trannies regard their very expensive transiting treatments as healthcare. In their eyes, it becomes the military's responsibility to turn them into the opposite gender.

      You know, not all trans people actually want or need to have sex reassignment surgery. And just because some of them feel that it's the military's responsibility to cover sex reassignment doesn't mean that military healthcare should cover it. A straight man with an ugly nose might similarly feel that it's the military's responsibility to cover his rhinoplasty for his psychological well being, but that doesn't mean that military healthcare should cover it. So they should all have such elective surgery done on their own dime by saving up for it same as if they worked for the private sector.