Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday April 13 2020, @04:04PM   Printer-friendly
from the cheaper-by-the-dozen dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

The head of Russia's space agency on Saturday accused Elon Musk's SpaceX of predatory pricing for space launches, which is pushing Russia to cut its own prices. "Instead of honest competition on the market for space launches, they are lobbying for sanctions against us and use price dumping with impunity," Roscosmos chief Dmitry Rogozin wrote on Twitter.

Rogozin, who is often outspoken on Twitter and previously engaged in online banter with Elon Musk, on Friday raised the issue during a meeting with President Vladimir Putin.

He said the Roscosmos space agency "is working to lower prices by more than 30 percent on launch services to increase our share on the international markets." "This is our answer to dumping by American companies financed by the US budget," he said. The market price of a SpaceX launch is $60 million, but NASA pays up to four times that amount, he said.

Musk responded to the criticism Saturday by saying on Twitter: "SpaceX rockets are 80% reusable, theirs are 0%. This is the actual problem."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Monday April 13 2020, @04:50PM (12 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Monday April 13 2020, @04:50PM (#982071) Journal

    OK, maybe you're right. But - please, point out the space-going concern that is NOT subsidized by government. Surely, you don't think that Roscosmos doesn't get any subsidies? Israel, India, China, Russia, United Kingdom, Iran - just run down the list of all nations that have put anything into orbit, and point out the one that wasn't subsidized. You can't do it.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by legont on Monday April 13 2020, @05:11PM (11 children)

    by legont (4179) on Monday April 13 2020, @05:11PM (#982080)

    I believe that everything capitalists was initially subsidized and free market is a horse shit designed to slow down less developed competitors.
    Free markets, like freedom and education, is a luxury that only very rich can afford. New players have to use unfair practices. Places that want "to become great again" are on the same boat as banana republics and Trump, as well as Musk, very much understand it and play dirty all the time intentionally.
    I am actually all for this. I just don't like moral edge that some folks like so much. Why? because it blinds one and makes him do bad financial decisions. Propaganda is for slaves.

    --
    "Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by takyon on Monday April 13 2020, @05:55PM (4 children)

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday April 13 2020, @05:55PM (#982106) Journal

      The Russian space program would have collapsed if America hadn't invited Russia to join the ISS.

      The Chill of U.S.-Russia Relations Creeps Into Space [theatlantic.com]

      Only after the dissolution of the Soviet Union did the most significant partnerships begin to take shape. In the early 1990s, the United States sought to build an international space station and invited Russia to join, along with Japan, Canada, and nine European nations. It was a self-serving decision; while showing support for a country in crisis, the United States would also gain access to impressive space technology, reduce costs, and employ former Soviet scientists and engineers who might otherwise work for enemy governments. That politically motivated choice, though, has led to decades of productive collaboration. Today the International Space Station has been continuously occupied, by rotating crews from both nations, for 18 years.

      ISS gave their engineers something to do other than build weapons for North Korea or whoever could flash the cash.

      It would have collapsed more recently if we hadn't kept buying overpriced Soyuz seats.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 1) by Sulla on Monday April 13 2020, @06:24PM (3 children)

        by Sulla (5173) on Monday April 13 2020, @06:24PM (#982126) Journal

        So what the Russians are really pissed about is that we are propping Musk's space ambitions up instead of propping up Russia's.

        --
        Ceterum censeo Sinae esse delendam
        • (Score: 3, Informative) by takyon on Monday April 13 2020, @07:19PM

          by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday April 13 2020, @07:19PM (#982158) Journal

          They are pissed that they have agile competition and that a lucrative money maker is about to dry up.

          It's not just SpaceX. They will also have to contend with China and India, at a minimum.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Human_Spaceflight_Programme [wikipedia.org]

          --
          [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
        • (Score: 3, Disagree) by barbara hudson on Tuesday April 14 2020, @02:29AM (1 child)

          by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Tuesday April 14 2020, @02:29AM (#982367) Journal

          Russia is less and less relevant, so not as much need to prop them up economically with seat purchases on Soyuz, and not as much need to keep up a pretence of international cooperation.

          --
          SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
          • (Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 14 2020, @09:03PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 14 2020, @09:03PM (#982773)

            See subject & a NICE DOSE of PUBLIC HUMILIATION for your own local FREAK barbara hudson folks: I "apologized" to you TRANNY twisto https://soylentnews.org/comments.pl?cid=937346&sid=35327 [soylentnews.org] ? FUCK NO, not ever: That's NOT me but I DESTROYED YOU PUBLICLY on every level including proving you barb stalk me on THIS SITE https://soylentnews.org/comments.pl?noupdate=1&sid=33430&page=1&cid=889582#commentwrap [soylentnews.org] with more proof QUOTED FROM YOU DIRECTLY barbara (tom) hudson proving are a technical incompetent brain-damaged transsexual fool BULLSHIT ARTIST FUCKUP worthless creep that also failed on tech vs. me.

            My post LITERALLY also shows links to stopping hundreds of threats of MANY KINDS via hosts (since 99% of malicious threats online use hostnames - block them as I do in hosts (less overhead vs. ANYTHING else by FAR & pure kernelmode TCP/IP stack efficient no less)?

            Can't TOUCH you nor you it. No threat possible.

            (...& that's ONLY a 1 year sample & I'd done THOUSANDS more at slashdot years before that and yes 99% use hostnames so hosts work against them harming you).

            So much for your usual lies barbara (tom TRANZOID monstrosity aberration you are) and useless online troll chatterbox you has never done better work and I fairly challenged you to show you did.

            You have not. You're all talk & ERRONEOUS talk (per the links above proving it you bullshit artist WANNABE do nothing LAZY bitch).

            NOW: You RESORTING TO IMPERSONATING ME on your end only PROVES I really got to you barb/tom hudson tranny.

            So much so you are reduced to showing us your true scum bag self in fact.

            Oh & I thought YOU were going to SUE me? LMAO! You DID threaten that, so where is it?? BUTTHURT not enough grounds to go after me on? Nope. You humiliated yourself there too stupid.

            ... & for what would you SUE me for, eh?

            FACTS ABOUT YOU ADMITTING STALKING/HARASSING ME???

            FACTS OF YOUR MANY multiple TECHNICAL FAILS on hosts, pascal vs. C/C++ I torched you on, that humiliated you & showed you are ALL BULLSHIT & not to be paid attention to bullshitter????

            LOL!

            * YOU WILL ALWAYS FAIL vs. me just as you FAILED @ being a MAN & since you couldn't GET ANY PUSSY you (lmao) DECIDED in your DRUG ADDLED BRAIN to SLICE OFF YOUR COCK & build your OWN pussy (only way you'd "get some", ever).... OMG!

            APK

            P.S.=> Hey FREAK - so now you like to IMPERSONATE me too? I'm going to PUBLICLY EMBARRASS YOUR ASS SO BAD on this site you will have to SLINK AROUND IN SHAME publicly but then, "your kind" (massive MASSIVE total losers in life) are USED to that, aren't you? You don't LIKE IT but I LOVE doing it, exposing you as the TRASH you are fucker... apk

    • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 13 2020, @06:06PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 13 2020, @06:06PM (#982115)

      That is an interesting position to take.

      Did you know that the world's largest company by market value, and also the large company owned by the world's richest man, were both started by individuals in their garages and subsidized by absolutely nothing except the personal (middle class) wealth of their founders? And the company that provided Elon Musk with the wealth he used to form Tesla and SpaceX (ok, buy, in the case of Tesla) also was formed in such a way?

      There are a lot of really obvious counterexamples to your bizarre and completely false belief.

    • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Monday April 13 2020, @07:22PM (3 children)

      by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Monday April 13 2020, @07:22PM (#982162) Journal

      That is clearly not true. Attic Greece was poverty stricken when it faced the Persians. And one Persian comment on Greece was "Who are these people who have special places where they go to cheat each other?".

      Now you could make arguments concering scale, and regulation, but those are generally considered impediments to "the free market" by those who call the selves believers in the Free Market.

      P.S.: Even Attica had *SOME* regulations on it's market. There never has been, and probably cannot exist, a totally free market. The questions are always about what regulations are reasonable. E.g., "Is it legal to misrepresent what you are selling?"

      --
      Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
      • (Score: 2) by legont on Monday April 13 2020, @10:44PM (2 children)

        by legont (4179) on Monday April 13 2020, @10:44PM (#982273)

        I highly recommend this book https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Plan_of_the_English_Commerce [wikipedia.org] on the subject.

        --
        "Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
        • (Score: 2, Funny) by khallow on Tuesday April 14 2020, @12:14PM (1 child)

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday April 14 2020, @12:14PM (#982538) Journal
          I see the publish date is 1728. Something might have happened in the three centuries since.
          • (Score: 3, Insightful) by legont on Wednesday April 15 2020, @02:01AM

            by legont (4179) on Wednesday April 15 2020, @02:01AM (#982884)

            One might want to know how England became the leader because China is about to do exactly the same. In fact China is probably doing it already.

            Hint: England inserted trade knife into Amsterdam while the old masters were busy fighting Spain. It did Dutch for good. Specifically, they Brits stopped all the trading in the most difficult moment and strangled them.

            --
            "Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 13 2020, @07:41PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 13 2020, @07:41PM (#982183)

      So why was it that when the US ended the Shuttle program, that the launch rate the Russians were charging NASA to get to the ISS increased 372 percent? Now that SpaceX can provide that for less money, the Russians have to slash their rate. I'm not sure what you are complaining about.

      If it makes you feel any better, the United Launch Alliance is feeling the squeeze by SpaceX as well.