Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday April 14 2020, @11:33PM   Printer-friendly
from the management-induced-flight-into-terrain dept.

Boeing customers cancel staggering 150 Max plane orders, deepening crisis as coronavirus roils air travel:

Boeing customers canceled a staggering number of 737 Max orders last month, deepening the crisis the company faces amid the coronavirus pandemic and the continued grounding of its bestselling plane after two fatal crashes.

The Chicago-based manufacturer on Tuesday posted 150 cancellations of its beleaguered 737 Max jets in March, the most in decades, the company said. Brazilian airline Gol canceled 34 of the narrow-body planes and leasing firm Avolon scrapped orders for 75 of them, a move it announced earlier this month. Net cancellations in the month totaled 119 thanks to 31 orders for wide-body passenger planes and military aircraft.

That brought net orders Boeing removed from its order list in [the]first three months of the year to 307 planes, a sharp turnaround for a company that just over a year ago was aiming to increase output of its planes to meet strong demand.

[...] Boeing's airline customers are now facing the steepest drop in demand ever recorded because of Covid-19 and harsh measures like stay-at-home orders to slow its spread. The pandemic comes on top of the more than year-long grounding of the 737 Max after 346 people were killed in two crashes.

Alternate source: Yahoo finance

<no-sarcasm>
I wonder. If the 737 MAX had not been grounded, would those orders have been cancelled, despite the Covid-19 downturn in airline flights.
</no-sarcasm>


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by julian on Wednesday April 15 2020, @12:47AM (4 children)

    by julian (6003) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday April 15 2020, @12:47AM (#982860)

    If Boeing is so essential that they need to be bailed out, then they need to be nationalized--proportional to the value of the money they are asking for. If they're not essential enough to be nationalized, then let them fail and restructure on their own.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=3, Interesting=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Ethanol-fueled on Wednesday April 15 2020, @12:58AM

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Wednesday April 15 2020, @12:58AM (#982863) Homepage

    If anybody decides that Boeing needs to be "Bailed out," it's the fucking Jews who will insist after Boeing perpetrated 9/11 and subsequently hired subhuman filth to write their life-critical guidance systems for the "Goyim," but not themselves.

    No. Boeing should die. Or hire true Americans again. Americans who don't get bonuses from crashing their shit into the twin towers or into the sea like stinky Indian or Neocon PNAC filth.

  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 15 2020, @02:16AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 15 2020, @02:16AM (#982887)

    In general, any corporation that takes bailout money should be partially or completely nationalized until the money is paid back. The terms should be so bad that they literally use it as a last resort before layoffs or declaring bankruptcy.

    In the case of Boeing, it's even more egregious as they've been spending loads of cash on stock buybacks rather than saving for a rainy day, on top of the gross incompetence that led to those plans being grounded due to fatal accidents.

    • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday April 15 2020, @04:07AM

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday April 15 2020, @04:07AM (#982917) Journal

      The term is correct here, but let us be sure it is applied correctly. Somehow, in my mind, the term seems to apply to the engineers and workmen who actually build the plane. But, that is probably just me.

      The real incompetence applies to the bean counters and management. The engineers designed the aircraft that management told them to design. Management over ruled some engineering decisions, in an attempt to save money. New training procedures for pilots were suggested somewhere along the way, and again, management over ruled any new (expensive) training procedures.

      I think it safe to say that the aircraft was somewhat less safe and reliable than it's immediate predecessor, if left to the engineers, builders, etc. Somewhat. If the men and women on the line had been left alone to produce this plane, it probably would have flown for decades without serious problems. It may have become an expensive maintenance headach, but it probably would have flown.

      Every unsafe condition here, can be traced back to bean counters and management. Truly incompetent SOB's. Redundant sensors, and pilot training are really all that were needed to fly this new aircraft safely.

  • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Wednesday April 15 2020, @02:26AM

    by Thexalon (636) on Wednesday April 15 2020, @02:26AM (#982888)

    With the current state of the US government, though, I don't think that will happen. We've spent the last 40 years with the best president and Congress money can buy. And it's shown again and again that when the rich come to Uncle Sam hat in hand, they get however large a handout they need, while when the poor and middle class ask for anything, they get told to sit down and shut up because their demands are unrealistic.

    And yes, it's a bipartisan fact of life in DC right now.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.