Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday April 15 2020, @08:26PM   Printer-friendly
from the the-sordid-art-of-deflection dept.

BBC: Coronavirus: US to halt funding to WHO, says Trump

US President Donald Trump has said he is going to halt funding to the World Health Organization (WHO) because it has "failed in its basic duty" in its response to the coronavirus outbreak.

[...] Mr Trump has been under fire for his own handling of the pandemic.

He has sought to deflect persistent criticism that he acted too slowly to stop the virus's spread by pointing to his decision in late January to place restrictions on travel from China.

[...] The US is the global health body's largest single funder and gave it more than $400m in 2019.

A decision on whether the US resumes funding will be made after the review, which Mr Trump said would last 60 to 90 days.

[...] China gave about $86m in 2018-19; UK gives most of any country apart from the US

[...] The organisation launched an appeal in March for $675m to help fight the pandemic and is reported to be planning a fresh appeal for at least $1bn.

Reuters: Trump halts World Health Organization funding amid coronavirus pandemic

President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he would halt funding to the World Health Organization over its handling of the coronavirus pandemic while his administration reviews its response to the global crisis.

Trump told a White House news conference the WHO had “failed in its basic duty and it must be held accountable.” He said the group had promoted China’s “disinformation” about the virus that likely led to a wider outbreak of the virus than otherwise would have occurred.

[...] The hold on funding was expected. Trump has been increasingly critical of the organization as the global health crisis has continued, and he has reacted angrily to criticism of his administration’s response.

[...] U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said on Tuesday it was “not the time” to reduce resources for the body.

“Now is the time for unity and for the international community to work together in solidarity to stop this virus and its shattering consequences,” he said.

American Medical Association President Dr. Patrice Harris called it “a dangerous step in the wrong direction that will not make defeating COVID-19 easier” and urged Trump to reconsider.

[...] The Republican president recently accused the WHO of being too lenient with China in the earliest days of the crisis, despite having himself praised China in January for its response and transparency.

Trump has made frequent use of scapegoats during his short political career. He often lashes out at the media, Democrats, or others when he feels attacked or under pressure.

The Guardian: Trump turns against WHO to mask his own stark failings on Covid-19 crisis

Donald Trump’s declared suspension of funding of the World Health Organisation in the midst of a pandemic is confirmation – if any were needed – that he is in search of scapegoats for his administration’s much delayed and chaotic response to the crisis.

The US is the WHO’s biggest donor, with funding over $400m a year in both assessed contributions (membership fees) and donations – though it is actually $200m in arrears. [pdf]

Theoretically the White House cannot block funding of international institutions mandated by Congress. But the administration has found ways around such constitutional hurdles on other issues – by simply failing to disburse funds or apply sanctions, for example.

The funding could be formally rescinded, but that would require Senate approval, or “reprogrammed” by being diverted to another purpose that the White House could argue is consistent with the will of Congress.

[...] The WHO director general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, had to fly to Beijing to meet Xi Jinping on 29 January to negotiate entry and information sharing. A WHO team was allowed to visit Wuhan on 22 February. Tedros has been criticised for his flattery of Xi and the Chinese response, in the face of Beijing’s obstructionism and cover-up attempts. His defenders said that such diplomacy was the price for entry.

Trump did more than his own fair share of Xi flattery. On 24 January, the president tweeted “China has been working very hard to contain the coronavirus … The United States greatly appreciates their efforts and transparency.”

The claim that the delay in the WHO acquiring samples crippled the international response is also false. Chinese scientists publicly released the genetic sequence of Covid-19 on 11 January.

[...] By early February the WHO was in a position to distribute a Covid-19 test worldwide, but the US government opted not to have it fast-tracked through approval. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) instead produced its own test at about the same time, but it was flawed and had to be recalled. US testing would be set back more than six weeks compared to the rest of the world.

While virtually no testing was under way in the US throughout February, Trump assumed the consequently low number of confirmed US cases meant that his country had somehow escaped. “The Coronavirus is very much under control in the USA,” he boasted on 24 February, nearly a month after the WHO declaration of emergency. “We are in contact with everyone and all relevant countries. CDC & World Health [Organisation] have been working hard and very smart. Stock Market starting to look very good to me!”


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Disagree) by Grishnakh on Wednesday April 15 2020, @09:36PM (6 children)

    by Grishnakh (2831) on Wednesday April 15 2020, @09:36PM (#983241)

    The left (center-left, not wacky far-left) in this country generally *are* the smarter and more educated ones.

    That doesn't mean they're geniuses, or even particularly smart. But when compare some random person to a drooling moron, it's not hard for them to look smart by comparison.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   0  
       Disagree=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Disagree' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Bot on Wednesday April 15 2020, @10:46PM (1 child)

    by Bot (3902) on Wednesday April 15 2020, @10:46PM (#983286) Journal

    Dumb people fear Islam and induced migratory fluxes, instinctively. Smart people embrace the change. Therefore smart people are dumber than drooling idiots. This is not a logical demonstration, this is a prediction. See you (JK) in 40 years.

    --
    Account abandoned.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 17 2020, @05:24AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 17 2020, @05:24AM (#984001)

      So you'll have checked out by then? I'd try and talk you out of it but I'm not a big jesus freak so I'm having trouble finding the compassion that supposedly makes Christians superior.

  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by PartTimeZombie on Wednesday April 15 2020, @10:47PM

    by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Wednesday April 15 2020, @10:47PM (#983287)

    That is because your centre-left wants to run the joint in the way it has been run for most of the last 50 years or more.

    Most of the right want power. They want all the power and they don't care what they break to get it. And keep it.

    Look at what Republicans did in Wisconsin when they lost an election. And in North Carolina to ensure they never lose. That is the future. Good luck.

  • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Thursday April 16 2020, @02:29AM (2 children)

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 16 2020, @02:29AM (#983392) Journal

    Sigh. More educated, yes. That's one particular kind of "smart". What the distinction between "left" and "right" actually is based on, however, is empathy. The "right" don't have much empathy for others. The "left" often have unreasonable empathy for others. (Well, to the extent that you can call empathy reasonable.) The other major difference is that the "right" are more likely to worship authority. Note that this isn't quite the same groups of "left" and "right" as the previous group, but they correlate fairly well.

    N.B.: Empathy can be highly restrictive. But you can be pretty certain that someone who calls someone else a "drooling moron" without explicit evidence isn't being very empathetic towards that person. Tribal groups are often highly empathetic to those who are members of the same tribe, while at the same time being extraordinarily brutal to those who are "outsiders". One can easily see the evolutionary advantage of this in the context that humanity evolved in, but in our current civilization the usefulness is questionable. But also questionable is the desire to believe what an authority says...though often there's no reasonable alternative. I'll take Winston Churchill's take on what happened in history over some random web page any time.

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 16 2020, @02:38AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 16 2020, @02:38AM (#983402)

      But you can be pretty certain that someone who calls someone else a "drooling moron" without explicit evidence isn't being very empathetic towards that person.

      What about the people who run the sob stories in the news every day, feigning crisis and promoting national imprisonment as a way to hurt Trump? I wouldn't call that "empathetic", but they are on the left.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 17 2020, @02:13AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 17 2020, @02:13AM (#983907)

        Trump is a corrupt criminal and traitor. You're entire premise is flawed. No I will not try and convince you of what everyone who is not brainwashed considers obvious.