Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Wednesday April 15 2020, @08:26PM   Printer-friendly
from the the-sordid-art-of-deflection dept.

BBC: Coronavirus: US to halt funding to WHO, says Trump

US President Donald Trump has said he is going to halt funding to the World Health Organization (WHO) because it has "failed in its basic duty" in its response to the coronavirus outbreak.

[...] Mr Trump has been under fire for his own handling of the pandemic.

He has sought to deflect persistent criticism that he acted too slowly to stop the virus's spread by pointing to his decision in late January to place restrictions on travel from China.

[...] The US is the global health body's largest single funder and gave it more than $400m in 2019.

A decision on whether the US resumes funding will be made after the review, which Mr Trump said would last 60 to 90 days.

[...] China gave about $86m in 2018-19; UK gives most of any country apart from the US

[...] The organisation launched an appeal in March for $675m to help fight the pandemic and is reported to be planning a fresh appeal for at least $1bn.

Reuters: Trump halts World Health Organization funding amid coronavirus pandemic

President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he would halt funding to the World Health Organization over its handling of the coronavirus pandemic while his administration reviews its response to the global crisis.

Trump told a White House news conference the WHO had “failed in its basic duty and it must be held accountable.” He said the group had promoted China’s “disinformation” about the virus that likely led to a wider outbreak of the virus than otherwise would have occurred.

[...] The hold on funding was expected. Trump has been increasingly critical of the organization as the global health crisis has continued, and he has reacted angrily to criticism of his administration’s response.

[...] U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said on Tuesday it was “not the time” to reduce resources for the body.

“Now is the time for unity and for the international community to work together in solidarity to stop this virus and its shattering consequences,” he said.

American Medical Association President Dr. Patrice Harris called it “a dangerous step in the wrong direction that will not make defeating COVID-19 easier” and urged Trump to reconsider.

[...] The Republican president recently accused the WHO of being too lenient with China in the earliest days of the crisis, despite having himself praised China in January for its response and transparency.

Trump has made frequent use of scapegoats during his short political career. He often lashes out at the media, Democrats, or others when he feels attacked or under pressure.

The Guardian: Trump turns against WHO to mask his own stark failings on Covid-19 crisis

Donald Trump’s declared suspension of funding of the World Health Organisation in the midst of a pandemic is confirmation – if any were needed – that he is in search of scapegoats for his administration’s much delayed and chaotic response to the crisis.

The US is the WHO’s biggest donor, with funding over $400m a year in both assessed contributions (membership fees) and donations – though it is actually $200m in arrears. [pdf]

Theoretically the White House cannot block funding of international institutions mandated by Congress. But the administration has found ways around such constitutional hurdles on other issues – by simply failing to disburse funds or apply sanctions, for example.

The funding could be formally rescinded, but that would require Senate approval, or “reprogrammed” by being diverted to another purpose that the White House could argue is consistent with the will of Congress.

[...] The WHO director general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, had to fly to Beijing to meet Xi Jinping on 29 January to negotiate entry and information sharing. A WHO team was allowed to visit Wuhan on 22 February. Tedros has been criticised for his flattery of Xi and the Chinese response, in the face of Beijing’s obstructionism and cover-up attempts. His defenders said that such diplomacy was the price for entry.

Trump did more than his own fair share of Xi flattery. On 24 January, the president tweeted “China has been working very hard to contain the coronavirus … The United States greatly appreciates their efforts and transparency.”

The claim that the delay in the WHO acquiring samples crippled the international response is also false. Chinese scientists publicly released the genetic sequence of Covid-19 on 11 January.

[...] By early February the WHO was in a position to distribute a Covid-19 test worldwide, but the US government opted not to have it fast-tracked through approval. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) instead produced its own test at about the same time, but it was flawed and had to be recalled. US testing would be set back more than six weeks compared to the rest of the world.

While virtually no testing was under way in the US throughout February, Trump assumed the consequently low number of confirmed US cases meant that his country had somehow escaped. “The Coronavirus is very much under control in the USA,” he boasted on 24 February, nearly a month after the WHO declaration of emergency. “We are in contact with everyone and all relevant countries. CDC & World Health [Organisation] have been working hard and very smart. Stock Market starting to look very good to me!”


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Bot on Wednesday April 15 2020, @10:05PM (11 children)

    by Bot (3902) on Wednesday April 15 2020, @10:05PM (#983258) Journal

    Jew is a state of mind, after all, it's a race because jews are more comfortable with that subdivision. In this regard, Gates's pedigree as a jew squared is called windows, and even if he develops actual viruses and kills people with vaccines, he has already peaked his damage to humanity with the humble PC. I think Soros keeps an autograph of Gates in his pocket and looks at it every evening for inspiration.

    --
    Account abandoned.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -2  
       Flamebait=3, Informative=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Flamebait' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 5, Touché) by Azuma Hazuki on Thursday April 16 2020, @12:11AM (10 children)

    by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Thursday April 16 2020, @12:11AM (#983328) Journal

    Good thing Jesus wasn't a Jew then!

    --
    I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
    • (Score: 2, Troll) by Bot on Thursday April 16 2020, @12:28PM (9 children)

      by Bot (3902) on Thursday April 16 2020, @12:28PM (#983539) Journal

      How can the Messiah be among those who don't recognize Him as such? That would take a fair amount of lack of belief in yourself and hypocrisy.

      Jews are by definition those who don't believe him. Your rebuttal stems from having adopted the "jews were first then came christians" racist narrative. BOOOO.

      Logically, either Christ is an impostor, or is the Messiah. If he is the Messiah, then Abraham was a Christian, Moses was a Christian, John the baptist was quite the Christian well before 30AD, and jews were born as a schismatic sect right when king Herod became a bit jealous of a newborn. If he is an impostor, then the followers of the true God might be the dwindling number of Hebrews that are not sold on zionism (which essentially gave up waiting for any messiah).

      --
      Account abandoned.
      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday April 16 2020, @08:29PM (8 children)

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 16 2020, @08:29PM (#983778) Journal

        Logically, either Christ is an impostor, or is the Messiah.

        Because there's no way for him to be both, amirite?

        • (Score: 2) by Bot on Friday April 17 2020, @03:58AM (7 children)

          by Bot (3902) on Friday April 17 2020, @03:58AM (#983952) Journal

          >Because there's no way for him to be both, amirite?

          there is maybe a way, but not in the context you are replying to.

          X says I am Y is either true or false, false DEFINES being impostor.

          --
          Account abandoned.
          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday April 17 2020, @04:02AM

            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 17 2020, @04:02AM (#983954) Journal

            X is not a single entity.

          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday April 17 2020, @04:03AM (5 children)

            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 17 2020, @04:03AM (#983956) Journal
            Sigh. Mangled last post. Trying again.

            X says I am Y is either true or false, false DEFINES being impostor.

            X is not a single entity.

            • (Score: 2) by Bot on Friday April 17 2020, @08:34PM (4 children)

              by Bot (3902) on Friday April 17 2020, @08:34PM (#984303) Journal

              and that would be relevant, how?

              --
              Account abandoned.
              • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday April 18 2020, @11:44AM (3 children)

                by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday April 18 2020, @11:44AM (#984538) Journal
                In that X doesn't have a single truth value.
                • (Score: 2) by Bot on Saturday April 18 2020, @07:50PM (2 children)

                  by Bot (3902) on Saturday April 18 2020, @07:50PM (#984652) Journal

                  are you referring to the Trinity? Matt 3 17 says the Son, which BTW is the only entity you can apply logic to.

                  --
                  Account abandoned.
                  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday April 18 2020, @09:15PM (1 child)

                    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday April 18 2020, @09:15PM (#984683) Journal
                    There's also billions of people with opinions on the matter. They're part of X.
                    • (Score: 2) by Bot on Sunday April 19 2020, @12:07AM

                      by Bot (3902) on Sunday April 19 2020, @12:07AM (#984714) Journal

                      Your approach to binary logic is sure wasteful. Prove that any opinion on the matter, not metadata like dunno, not sure, provides a different value than T o F to the assertion, then you will have something.

                      --
                      Account abandoned.