Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Friday April 17 2020, @06:16AM   Printer-friendly
from the interesting-ideas dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Future technologies that could enable quicker trips to Mars and robotic exploration of ocean worlds might have started out as NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC). The program, which invests in early-stage technology ideas from NASA, industry and academic researchers across the country, has selected 23 potentially revolutionary concepts with a total award value of $7 million.

Among the selections are 16 new concepts and seven studies that previously received at least one NIAC award. A full list of the 2020 Phase I, II and III selections can be found here.[*]

"NIAC is an innovative program that encourages researchers—and the agency—to think outside of the box for solutions that could overcome challenges facing future science and exploration missions," said Walt Engelund, the deputy associate administrator for programs within NASA's Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD). "We're excited about the new concepts and to see how additional time and resources advances the research selected for follow-on Phase II and III studies."

[...] The selected Phase I and II studies will explore the overall viability of a technology and develop them into mission concepts. Areas researchers will study include mapping asteroids and other small bodies in the solar system with hopping probes, making pharmaceuticals on-demand in space, and extracting water on the Moon. Several of the concepts could inform capabilities relevant to NASA's Artemis program, which will land the first woman and next man on the Moon in 2024 and establish a sustainable presence on and around the Moon by 2028.

NASA selected the proposals through a peer-review process that evaluates innovation and technical viability. All projects are still in the early stages of development, with most requiring a decade or more of technology maturation, and are not official NASA missions.

[*] It seems there is no link provided in the original story; it appears to be intended to link to: NIAC 2020 Phase I, Phase II and Phase III Selections.[--martyb]


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday April 17 2020, @08:43AM (4 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 17 2020, @08:43AM (#984048) Journal

    Sadly any real breakthrough will be easily coopted into a weapons system.

    Until humanity gets over the base tribalism and rolls the doomsday clock back to 1AM any scientist worth their muster will burn their research before letting any group get their hands on revolutionary tech.

    Sounds like there's plenty of scientists "not worth their muster" then, because the "revolutionary" tech is happening.

    As to "base tribalism", welcome to conflicts of interest 101. There will be base tribalism until there is zero or one distinct entities interacting in the Solar System.

  • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Friday April 17 2020, @02:00PM (3 children)

    by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 17 2020, @02:00PM (#984107) Homepage Journal

    Grammatical question:
          there is zero or one distinct entities
    or
          there is zero or one distinct entity
    or
          there are zero or one distinct entities
    or
          there are zero or one distinct entity

    I really don't know.

    -- hendrik

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 17 2020, @08:33PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 17 2020, @08:33PM (#984302)

      Grammatical question:
            there is zero or one distinct entities
      or
            there is zero or one distinct entity
      or
            there are zero or one distinct entities
      or
            there are zero or one distinct entity

      I really don't know.

      Zero requires a plural form which then spreads, but this is one of those cases where you really have to be verbose.

      there are zero entities or one distinct entity.

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday April 18 2020, @02:36AM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday April 18 2020, @02:36AM (#984435) Journal
        So I should write "one entity or two entities" instead of "one or two entities"? Hold my beer. I got this.
      • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Thursday April 23 2020, @10:27PM

        by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 23 2020, @10:27PM (#986235) Homepage Journal

        Confusing. Its possible to have zero distinct entities when you have hundreds of entities that are not distinct.