Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday April 20 2020, @03:16PM   Printer-friendly
from the who-watches-the-watchers? dept.

National security concerns just won out over Twitter's attempt to be transparent about surveillance:

Six years ago, Twitter sued the US government in an attempt to detail surveillance requests the company had received, but a federal judge on Friday ruled in favor of the government's case that detailing the requests would jeopardize the country's safety.

If Twitter revealed the number of surveillance requests it received each calendar quarter, it "would be likely to lead to grave or imminent harm to the national security," US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers concluded after reviewing classified information from the government. See below for the full ruling.

"While we are disappointed with the court's decision, we will continue to fight for transparency," Twitter said in a statement Saturday.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by looorg on Monday April 20 2020, @06:35PM

    by looorg (578) on Monday April 20 2020, @06:35PM (#985178)

    Are there even enough spare bits around to declare them? Perhaps they could invent some kind of colour-wheel to indicate an approximate number, that way they don't have to tell the actual number ... not sure but something in the spectrum of holy-shit-brown or hell-frozen-over-blue perhaps?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2