Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday April 22 2020, @02:50PM   Printer-friendly
from the when-it's-a-good-thing-to-sing-the-blues dept.

Ancient recipes led scientists to a long-lost natural blue:

The pigment, called folium, graced the pages of medieval manuscripts. But it fell out of use, and the watercolor’s identity has eluded scientists for decades. Now, after tracking down folium’s source, researchers have mapped out the chemical structure for its blue-producing molecule.

Such chemical information can be key to art conservation. “We want to mimic these ancient colors to know how to … preserve them,” says Maria Melo, a conservation scientist at Universidade Nova de Lisboa in Caparica, Portugal. But to unmask folium’s identity, Melo and her team first had to find where it came from.

The researchers turned to medieval texts that described the source plant. With the help of a botanist, they discovered Chrozophora tinctoria, a tiny herb with silvery-green foliage. In a village in the south of Portugal, the team found the wild plant growing along the roadside and in fields after harvest. Back in the lab, researchers extracted the pigment from its pebble-sized fruits by following directions detailed in the medieval manuscripts. “It was really great fun to recover these recipes,” Melo says.

Journal Reference:
P. Nabais et al. "A 1000-year-old mystery solved: Unlocking the molecular structure for the medieval blue from Chrozophora tinctoria, also known as folium". Science Advances. Published online April 17, 2020. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz7772.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by looorg on Wednesday April 22 2020, @05:08PM (4 children)

    by looorg (578) on Wednesday April 22 2020, @05:08PM (#985772)

    Just out of curiosity what is the RGB value for it? Or CMYK? "Blue" just doesn't really do it for me.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 22 2020, @06:31PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 22 2020, @06:31PM (#985806)

    It depends on your monitor.

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by RamiK on Wednesday April 22 2020, @06:33PM (2 children)

    by RamiK (1813) on Wednesday April 22 2020, @06:33PM (#985808)

    Seems a fairly dark blue between #000033 to #000066: https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/advances/6/16/eaaz7772/F1.large.jpg [sciencemag.org]

    --
    compiling...
    • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Wednesday April 22 2020, @11:19PM

      by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Wednesday April 22 2020, @11:19PM (#985895)

      I have never got used to those hex codes. It looks kind of like reflex blue to me.

    • (Score: 2) by ChrisMaple on Thursday April 23 2020, @02:31AM

      by ChrisMaple (6964) on Thursday April 23 2020, @02:31AM (#985934)

      I have a program that reports the color at the mouse pointer. The darker of the 2 cloths in the middle of the JPEG you linked gives an average value about 0x081042. That's a pretty good blue for a natural plant substance.