SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the how-to-make-use-of-52-3.5-inch-floppy-disks? dept.
Ubuntu "mini.iso" Minimal Install .ISO for 20.04 LTS.
Compared to the DVD-sized downloads for some distributions, the Ubuntu 20.04 LTS mini.iso is only 74 MB.
I prefer using the mini.iso, but they moved it to a legacy directory. You can use the path on their downloads server, which appears to be HTTP only, or you can get an HTTPS connection to download it. Here is an example, from a mirror:
- Directory
- mini.iso, The File Itself
- Checksums, GPG signatures, Files List, Directory
- Checksums [*]
- GPG signatures [*]
- Files List [*]
[*] These are my preferred sources.
Why?
Since they've moved mini.iso to a "legacy" directory, I would guess they plan to discontinue the mini.iso install method sometime in the future?
Fix for a possible problem install:
A user on Reddit experienced a problem in this thread:
"after what seemed to be successful installation, I don't get login prompt at all. Seems everything is loaded, but there is no prompt"
to which a user replied with the apparent fix:
"I fixed it, here's how: even if there's no prompt ALT-F2 works (switching to single-user mode), then you can login, and installed KDE with "sudo apt install kde-plasma-desktop", and next time it booted I got KDE login screen." (this assumes you want KDE Plasma Desktop installed. You could probably substitute this with a different desktop file, or you may not experience the problem in which case these final details are not useful for you.)
BTW, as of this posting date, the locations on Ubuntu's Help/Wiki pages are URLs for older versions of this file, should you seek out more information about the mini.iso files from these areas on their website. Many places across the web are also likely to link you to versions older than 20.04 LTS, with a different directory location/layout.
Please share this information with others, seed via BitTorrent if you want, and enjoy the Ubuntu 20.04 LTS mini.iso (Minimal Install) while the option is still available.
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday April 30 2020, @05:35PM (5 children)
Are you referring to Unity being replaced by GNOME 3?
That is just as bad, IMO. Others may have differing opinions.
So recently, I was thinking about doing something I haven't done since the 90's. Trying out some C++ with a GUI framework. Looking on Wikipedia, reading articles, I of course, looked at GTK 3. Even on the normally neutral WP the negativity was detectable.
The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
(Score: 2) by gtomorrow on Thursday April 30 2020, @07:53PM (4 children)
Ohhhhhh!!! There's the DannyB I know and love!
IIRC, Unity was EOL'd around Ubuntu 17-something, maybe 18. It's still available as a login choice...but why? It is literally flogging a dead horse. So I'm "stuck" with GNOME 3xx, "Ubuntified." Pity me! 🤣
And although I appreciate in advance the slew of suggestions to follow this comment, "no thank you" to the other DEs, going back to that Win95 paradigm I mentioned before. Hey, that's just me.
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday April 30 2020, @09:05PM
I remember reading about Gnome 3 being the replacement. But it is not important to me to remember that fact. They both look exactly the same, as delivered in Ubuntu. So what's really the difference?
The BIG difference is that Ubuntu does not have the UI that everyone has been using for the last three plus decades.
I did try (and mostly succeed) at using it. But I should not have to THINK that much to accomplish basic tasks. Same with Windows 8. Basic things should be reflex muscle memory. So I switch to Xfce because it's light wait.
The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
(Score: 1) by petecox on Friday May 01 2020, @08:29AM (2 children)
(Score: 2) by gtomorrow on Friday May 01 2020, @09:57AM (1 child)
Pete, thanks for the link. I was aware of the non-Canonical, continuing development of Unity (Unity8) but wasn't aware of this name-change.
It's also interesting that Ubuntu Touch/Convergence and Mir development are also being continued; I had always thought that both were excellent ideas worth pursuing. IMHO, Touch/Convergence was the only "plan" that seemed to work, as opposed to, say, Microsoft's Win8-Win10 ideas of "convergence", which itself is funny as, with the death of Windows Phone, they gave up on converging anything...except their users' personal data.
Wayland has always seemed to me the "solution looking for a problem." Someone correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Mir development long underway before Wayland?
Two things...is this Lomiri thang actually available for installation? I read almost the entire site and didn't find anything about it other than your linked page. But honestly, I no longer have the inclination for turning my Ubuntu machine inside-out just to beta test an OE.
But thanks again!
(Score: 1) by petecox on Friday May 01 2020, @11:30AM
Ubuntu Touch has been kept alive by volunteers who share your enthusiasm for Convergence. It's seeing something of a renaissance with fresh hardware from Pine64.
NB: I only follow the project loosely; they have a new OTA-12 in 2 weeks that I will flash onto my old Nexus phone.
Lomiri can't be installed on desktop just yet, it's currently being upstreamed to debian [sunweavers.net], which will make it downstream into a future Ubuntu! I guess making it into debian emphasises it's no longer just an Ubuntu-only technology, let alone a Canonical project any longer.
I have no inclination to revisit the flamewars of almost a decade ago but to answer your question, I think Wayland may have predated Mir but Canonical didn't judge suitable for their needs nor mature enough at the time. But now by 2020, Mir dropped its own protocol and implements Wayland, so...