Possibly paywalled: There's finally a Supreme Court battle coming over the nation's main hacking law (Alternative URL)
The Supreme Court is finally considering whether to rein in the nation's sweeping anti-hacking law, which cybersecurity pros say is decades out of date and ill-suited to the modern Internet.
The justices agreed to hear a case this fall that argues law enforcement and prosecutors have routinely applied the law too broadly and used it to criminalize not just hacking into websites but also far more innocuous behavior – such as lying about your name or location while signing up on a website or otherwise violating the site's terms of service.
If the court agrees to narrow how prosecutors can use the law, it would be a huge victory for security researchers.They routinely skirt websites' strict terms of service when they investigate them for bugs that cybercriminals could exploit.
It would also make the Internet far safer, they say. That's because current interpretations of the 1986 law, known as the Computer Fraud and Abuse act (CFAA), have made researchers wary of revealing bugs they find because they fear getting in trouble with police or with companies, which can also sue under the law in civil courts.
"Computer researchers are constantly afraid that a security test they run is going to run them afoul of the law," Tor Ekeland, an attorney who specializes in defending people accused of violating the CFAA, told me. "This law makes the Internet less safe because it chills legitimate information security research and it's bad for the economy because it chills innovation."
The fight centers on whether the law should apply just to hacking or more broadly to breaking rules on a computer.
How many Soylentils read the entire terms of service of all the web sites they visit? In some cases, people have been convicted of crimes for violating them. It would be best to read the entire article before commenting as there are several nuances and historical precedents that it addresses.
(Score: 4, Funny) by DannyB on Thursday April 30 2020, @05:20PM (7 children)
So you are encouraging people to violate SN's TOS?
People today are educated enough to repeat what they are taught but not to question what they are taught.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 30 2020, @06:09PM (5 children)
Oh fuck... SN has a TOS?
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 30 2020, @07:05PM (4 children)
Not quite, Code of Conduct last time this topic came up.
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday April 30 2020, @09:47PM
The Code of Conduct has not yet been successfully compiled. An work this noble requires the efforts of many artisans before the compiler will be inclined to accept it.
People today are educated enough to repeat what they are taught but not to question what they are taught.
(Score: 1, Troll) by Ethanol-fueled on Thursday April 30 2020, @10:50PM (2 children)
Heh heh...huh huh...you said "CoC."
And as somebody who is penilly challenged, I feel that the term "CoC" discourages diversity and inclusivity and fosters an unsafe atmosphere toward the penilly challenged and penis-envious. I will hereby protest that grave injustive by posting the word NIGGER. And as a Black woman, I am allowed to post that without being modded down.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 30 2020, @11:18PM
borefest 2020
(Score: 2) by Aegis on Friday May 01 2020, @02:29PM
And Ethanol-feueled would know; he's got a lifetime's worth of experience on being penally challenged and penis-envious.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by captain normal on Thursday April 30 2020, @11:34PM
If we did require people tp RTFA, it would sure speed up reading the threads.
When life isn't going right, go left.