Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Saturday May 02 2020, @02:20AM   Printer-friendly
from the you've-got-another-fine-comin' dept.

Elon Musk tweet wipes $14bn off Tesla's value:

The tweet also knocked $3bn off Mr Musk's own stake in Tesla as investors promptly bailed out of the company.

"Tesla stock price is too high imo," he said, one of several tweets that included a vow to sell his possessions.

In other tweets, he said his girlfriend was mad at him, while another simply read: "Rage, rage against the dying of the light of consciousness."

In 2018, a tweet about Tesla's future on the New York stock market led to regulators fining him $20m and agreeing to have all further posts on the platform pre-screened by lawyers.

Previously:
(2019-04-27) Elon Musk Reaches Settlement in SEC Tweet Battle
(2018-10-06) Elon Musk Isn't on His Twitter Leash Yet, So He's Taunting the SEC
(2018-09-30) SEC Settlement: Elon Musk Resigns as Chairman of Tesla, Stays as CEO, $40 Million in Fines Paid
(2018-09-28) Elon Musk Accused by SEC of Misleading Investors in August Tweet [Updated]


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday May 02 2020, @10:22AM (9 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday May 02 2020, @10:22AM (#989397) Journal

    this was nothing part from direct manipulation of the stock price, there's no joke way of interpretting it.

    So what? Companies do that all the time when they "provide guidance". I think the bigger issues are 1) is it true? and 2) does he profit by that manipulation.

    But then, I'd rather the SEC be burned to the ground than impair the speech of corporate officials on twitter. YMMV.

    That it also harms shareholder value pops a cartridge into the second chambre.

    So why shouldn't the CEO say something, if say, they think the stock is way overpriced? Even in the most aggressive interpretations of fiduciary responsibility, it's not the job of the CEO to support short term stock prices.

  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Saturday May 02 2020, @10:59AM (1 child)

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Saturday May 02 2020, @10:59AM (#989408) Homepage
    It cannot be true. It can be meaningless, but never true. Its price is its price, the cost at which a sale occurs, it is neither too high nor to low. No reference was made to value, we're presuming that's what the price is in comparison to. However, even then, its price is the perceived future value, by whomever is paying that price. So likewise it can't be too high.

    Given that a business corporation is organized and carried on primarily for the profit of the stockholders, causing the price to drop harms the stockholders' ability to make profit from the stock, it seems a clear-cut violation of the law. So yes, it is indeed the CEO's job to at least not unnecessarily endanger short term stock prices.

    However, my mileage would not vary greatly from yours, I think such clauses obligating the above should be struck from the laws, such that there was no law to violate. But they are there, so they should be disinterestedly upheld. Douchebag CEO? Company won't live as long. That perfectly fits in with idealised Capitalism.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    • (Score: 2, Touché) by khallow on Saturday May 02 2020, @11:15AM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday May 02 2020, @11:15AM (#989416) Journal

      It cannot be true. It can be meaningless, but never true. Its price is its price, the cost at which a sale occurs, it is neither too high nor to low. No reference was made to value, we're presuming that's what the price is in comparison to. However, even then, its price is the perceived future value, by whomever is paying that price. So likewise it can't be too high.

      Well, it's a lower price now.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 02 2020, @11:08AM (6 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 02 2020, @11:08AM (#989412)

    They raised $2 billion last quarter and forgot to tell investors that it was overpriced before taking their money.

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday May 02 2020, @11:18AM (5 children)

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday May 02 2020, @11:18AM (#989418) Journal
      Last quarter was also before most of the present coronavirus mess. Things have changed.
      • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Saturday May 02 2020, @03:12PM (4 children)

        by fustakrakich (6150) on Saturday May 02 2020, @03:12PM (#989501) Journal

        Things have changed.

        No they haven't. They just repeat.

        --
        La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday May 02 2020, @03:44PM (3 children)

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday May 02 2020, @03:44PM (#989512) Journal
          No millions of coronavirus cases in February. No Tesla business shutdown in February.
          • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Saturday May 02 2020, @04:08PM (2 children)

            by fustakrakich (6150) on Saturday May 02 2020, @04:08PM (#989516) Journal

            That almost made sense

            --
            La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
            • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday May 02 2020, @04:12PM (1 child)

              by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday May 02 2020, @04:12PM (#989518) Journal
              Try thinking. Business world doesn't cycle on three month periods.
              • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Saturday May 02 2020, @04:24PM

                by fustakrakich (6150) on Saturday May 02 2020, @04:24PM (#989521) Journal

                Yeah, so? Who said anything about three month business cycles? For them, it's a speed bump, and the government is bailing them out. Like I said, a repeat

                --
                La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..