Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday May 05 2020, @05:17AM   Printer-friendly
from the Not-in-my-back-yard dept.

One of the issues involving nuclear power has been what to do with the waste materials. What if there was a way to not only convert the problematic materials into a safer storage form, but also enable that same storage form to be used as fuel in newer nuclear power generators? Sounds too good to be true, doesn't it?
That may have changed:
https://phys.org/news/2020-05-reveals-single-step-strategy-recycling-nuclear.html

I would prefer more 'green' sources of energy production, but this is something that may be useful to help that along, making coal and petroleum energy production a part of history.

Journal Reference
Jeffrey D. Einkauf, Jonathan D. Burns. Recovery of Oxidized Actinides, Np(VI), Pu(VI), and Am(VI), from Cocrystallized Uranyl Nitrate Hexahydrate: A Single Technology Approach to Used Nuclear Fuel Recycling, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c00381)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday May 05 2020, @04:47PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday May 05 2020, @04:47PM (#990772) Journal
    Perhaps you should say what's on your mind? No one has measured any variation in gravitational fields from nuclear reactions. Normally, this is not an issue since it is much weaker than other forces and most of the range of such variation would be extremely hard to observe and outside the sensitivity of modern instruments.

    But you seem to be concerned about a readily observable change in gravitational field. Which we don't readily observe.