Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday May 16 2020, @04:42PM   Printer-friendly

Medieval arrows caused injuries similar to gunshot wounds, study finds:

The English longbow was a powerful medieval weapon said to be able to pierce an opponent's armor and may have been a decisive factor in several key military victories, most notably the Battle of Agincourt. A recent paper published in the Antiquaries Journal by a team of archaeologists at the University of Exeter in the UK has yielded evidence that longbow arrows created similar wounds to modern-day gunshot wounds and were capable of penetrating through long bones.

Historians continue to debate just how effective the longbow was in battle. There have been numerous re-enactment experiments with replicas, but no medieval-period longbows have survived, although many 16th-century specimens were recovered from the wreck of the Mary Rose. The University of Exeter's Oliver Creighton, who led the latest study, and his co-authors argue that such experiments are typically done over shorter ranges, so the arrows are not fully stable and spinning in flight. This, in turn, would affect the kinds of injuries combatants sustained. He and his team believe their analysis shows the importance of osteological evidence in helping to resolve such debates.

It's relatively rare to find direct evidence of violent trauma from weapons to skeletal remains in medieval burial sites, with the exception of mass burials from known historical battles. The best-known such sites are associated with the 1361 Battle of Visby in Gotland, Sweden, and the 1461 Battle of Towton in North Yorkshire, England. Per the authors, data from these sites has yielded useful information on "the realities of medieval warfare—how people fought and were killed, which weapons were used and what sorts of injuries these caused, and what armor (if any) was worn." Evidence of trauma specifically caused by arrowheads is even rarer.

The current study examined 22 bone fragments and three teeth, all showing clear signs of trauma. All were collected during the excavation of the burial ground of a medieval Dominican friary in Exeter from 1997 to 2007, to prepare for the construction of the Princesshay shopping district. Established in 1232 and officially consecrated in 1259, the friary's burial grounds likely included wealthy, high-status laypersons, according to the authors.

[...] "These results have profound implications for our understanding of the power of the medieval longbow; for how we recognize arrow trauma in the archaeological record; and for where battle casualties were buried," Creighton told Medievalists.net. "In the medieval world, death caused by an arrow in the eye or the face could have special significance. Clerical writers sometimes saw the injury as a divinely ordained punishment, with the 'arrow in the eye' which may or may not have been sustained by King Harold II on the battlefield of Hastings in 1066 the most famous case in point. Our study brings into focus the horrific reality of such an injury."

DOI: Antiquaries Journal, 2020. 10.1017/S0003581520000116 (About DOIs).


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by Arik on Saturday May 16 2020, @05:16PM (2 children)

    by Arik (4543) on Saturday May 16 2020, @05:16PM (#995047) Journal
    "Agincourt"

    "co-authors argue that such experiments are typically done over shorter ranges, so the arrows are not fully stable and spinning in flight."

    /Really?/

    25 metres is admittedly fairly short range, but so short the arrows haven't stabilized?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBxdTkddHaE
    --
    If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 17 2020, @09:52PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 17 2020, @09:52PM (#995473)

    Yeah. If you've done much archery you're aware that fletching, wind, a rough release, all give a lot of time-varying parameters. The arrow itself deforms in and out of ) | ( shapes in one axis (relative to it). A perfectly true arrow with superb fletching will spin (rifle) the entire time it is in flight. The other oscillations dampen. 25m is far enough for smooth flight with a good arrow from a cheap slow bow, but a heavy pull compound, the lateral oscillations alone will be quite noticeable at 25m still.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 18 2020, @01:02PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 18 2020, @01:02PM (#995728)

    History might have been a bit different if this guy was around and made stuff like this back then:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ka2DB5DcH8 [youtube.com]
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13XY7q78L20 [youtube.com]

    Stuff like this could have slowed the adoption of guns. 1000 musketeers vs 1000 archers using these, I'd bet on the archers. They'd be able to fire about five arrows in the time it takes for the musketeers to reload. And the lethal range could be much further than the first muskets - could be similar to the English longbow for lower draw weight. The training would be easier too. Takes more training to load a musket properly when under pressure.