Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday May 17 2020, @11:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the is-there-anyon-out-there dept.

Researchers lead by Gwendel Fève, a physicist at Sorbonne University in Paris, have discovered the first experimental evidence that certain quasi-particles are 'anyons', members of a third kingdom of particles that are not fermions or bosons.

Every last particle in the universe — from a cosmic ray to a quark — is either a fermion or a boson. These categories divide the building blocks of nature into two distinct kingdoms.

While Quasi-particles demonstrating fractional quantum hall effect and displaying a fraction of the charge of a single electron had been observed before, this research is the first that demonstrates that they match predicted anyon behavior.

In 1984, a seminal two-page paper by [Frank A Wilzczek], Daniel Arovas and John Robert Schrieffer showed that these quasiparticles had to be anyons. But scientists had never observed anyon-like behavior in these quasiparticles. That is, they had been unable to prove that anyons are unlike either fermions or bosons, neither bunching together nor totally repelling one another.

That's what the new study does. In 2016, three physicists described an experimental setup that resembles a tiny particle collider in two dimensions. Fève and his colleagues built something similar and used it to smash anyons together. By measuring the fluctuations of the currents in the collider, they were able to show that the behavior of the anyons corresponds exactly with theoretical predictions.

"Everything fits with the theory so uniquely, there are no questions," said Dmitri Feldman, a physicist at Brown University who was not involved in the recent work. "That's very unusual for this field, in my experience."

Journal Reference:
H. Bartolomei, M. Kumar, R. Bisognin, et al. Fractional statistics in anyon collisions [$], Science (DOI: 10.1126/science.aaz5601)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday May 19 2020, @06:29PM (3 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday May 19 2020, @06:29PM (#996447) Journal

    the speed of light could vary/slow in a vacuum due to virtual particles interfering with photons.

    Why would virtual particles behave differently in one part of vacuum than another?

  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday May 19 2020, @07:06PM (2 children)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Tuesday May 19 2020, @07:06PM (#996471) Journal

    If gravity, magnetic fields, or whatever can affect the virtual particles, they could behave differently.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday May 19 2020, @07:16PM (1 child)

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday May 19 2020, @07:16PM (#996475) Journal
      Good point. Gravity in particular might be a big player since we've transitioned from a high gravitation potential to a lower one over the billions of years.
      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday May 19 2020, @07:22PM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday May 19 2020, @07:22PM (#996478) Journal
        Thinking about it, black holes and neutron stars might be a good way to find if virtual particle interactions are a problem. For example, we'd see subtle differences in gravitational lensing and light orbits [wikipedia.org] (around black holes). If virtual particle interactions are slowing down light, then the light orbits should be further away from the black hole than predicted by present theory.