Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday May 20 2020, @01:36AM   Printer-friendly
from the year-of-linux-on-the-desktop dept.

Microsoft is bringing Linux GUI apps to Windows 10:

Linux on Windows 10 gets a big boost and GPU acceleration

Microsoft is promising to dramatically improve its Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) with GUI app support and GPU hardware acceleration. The software giant is adding a full Linux kernel to Windows 10 with WSL version 2 later this month, and it’s now planning to support Linux GUI apps that will run alongside regular Windows apps.

This will be enabled without Windows users having to use X11 forwarding, and it’s mainly designed for developers to run Linux integrated development environments (IDE) alongside regular Windows apps.

While it has been possible to run Linux GUI apps within Windows previously using a third-party X server, poor graphics performance has always been an issue. Microsoft is promising to solve this, too. Windows 10 will soon get added support for GPU hardware acceleration with Linux tools. This is primarily focused on development scenarios involving parallels computation or training machine learning and artificial intelligence models.

So is it the year of Linux on the Desktop?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by aiwarrior on Wednesday May 20 2020, @07:24AM (7 children)

    by aiwarrior (1812) on Wednesday May 20 2020, @07:24AM (#996779) Journal

    Even if a new license is coming it, projects cannot just fork and change the license if it would be incompatible. Quite aa lot of FUD.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Pav on Wednesday May 20 2020, @07:33AM (5 children)

    by Pav (114) on Wednesday May 20 2020, @07:33AM (#996783)

    Fork? The FSF requires contributors on its projects to transfer copyright to them so there's no need.

    • (Score: 2) by aiwarrior on Wednesday May 20 2020, @08:33AM (3 children)

      by aiwarrior (1812) on Wednesday May 20 2020, @08:33AM (#996798) Journal

      And? This not stop a fork on the still GPL code. Oracle has pulled such tricks with the db berkeley and made it AGPL. The community just forked and continued on the GPL code.

      • (Score: 2) by Pav on Wednesday May 20 2020, @08:51AM (2 children)

        by Pav (114) on Wednesday May 20 2020, @08:51AM (#996801)

        And GitHub, the US government (US Navy, NASA etc...), Tesla, Netflix, WeChat, Facebook, Zendesk, Twitter, Zappos, YouTube, Spotify etc... including their developer contributions stuck with MySQL. Community divided, victory largely achieved, all while nerds deny reality online so nothing is learned.

        • (Score: 3, Interesting) by aiwarrior on Wednesday May 20 2020, @10:41AM (1 child)

          by aiwarrior (1812) on Wednesday May 20 2020, @10:41AM (#996824) Journal

          It goes both ways. I just gave you an example of the other way around, ironically from Oracle also. I do not see any victory achieved, specially in the DB space where there is so much diversity already, open and closed source. Actually your example shows exactly that software where there is plenty of support it is a non issue. I can guarantee you that those exact same companies are the first to switch if the community dies.

          So i politely disagree. For what is worth i manage an embedded linux distribution for a very big telecom base station manufacturer. We want to take as much for free as possible. Dead communities do not provide "value" so we just move to the next one. The Open source community is self healing.

          • (Score: 2) by Pav on Friday May 22 2020, @04:01AM

            by Pav (114) on Friday May 22 2020, @04:01AM (#997716)

            It doesn't have to result in a project kill. It just has to slow development enough, perhaps make security worse because of less eyes etc... so that life is easier for Oracle. How is that NOT a win?

    • (Score: 2) by istartedi on Wednesday May 20 2020, @12:45PM

      by istartedi (123) on Wednesday May 20 2020, @12:45PM (#996852) Journal

      What does it even mean to transfer copyright under GPL? You just get the license right back from the entity to which you transfer. I guess the FSF could make it proprietary for subsequent versions. You retain all the GPL rights, right up to the moment they do that. If that ever happened, any of the copies out there could be used for a fork, and that would be perfectly legal AFAIK. Maybe they would have to change the name of the project, but that's about it I think. LOL, we'd have "Free GNU" like "Free DOS".

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by TheRaven on Thursday May 21 2020, @10:54AM

    by TheRaven (270) on Thursday May 21 2020, @10:54AM (#997326) Journal
    Amusingly, you can't fork the GPL itself: the text is copyrighted by the FSF and they do not allow derived works to be distributed.
    --
    sudo mod me up