Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday May 22 2020, @12:44AM   Printer-friendly
from the supreme-commander dept.

Quantum computers theoretically can prove more powerful than any supercomputer, and now scientists calculate just what quantum computers need to attain such "quantum supremacy," and whether or not Google achieved it with their claims last year.

Superposition lets one qubit perform two calculations at once, and if two qubits are linked through a quantum effect known as entanglement, they can help perform 2^2 or four calculations simultaneously; three qubits, 2^3 or eight calculations; and so on. In principle, a quantum computer with 300 qubits could perform more calculations in an instant than there are atoms in the visible universe.

It remains controversial how many qubits are needed to achieve quantum supremacy over standard computers. Last year, Google claimed to achieve quantum supremacy with just 53 qubits, performing a calculation in 200 seconds that the company estimated would take the world's most powerful supercomputer 10,000 years, but IBM researchers argued in a blog post "that an ideal simulation of the same task can be performed on a classical system in 2.5 days and with far greater fidelity."

To see what quantum supremacy might actually demand, researchers analyzed three different ways quantum circuits that might solve problems conventional computers theoretically find intractable. Instantaneous Quantum Polynomial-Time (IQP) circuits are an especially simple way to connect qubits into quantum circuits. Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) circuits are more advanced, using qubits to find good solutions to optimization problems. Finally, boson sampling circuits use photons instead of qubits, analyzing the paths such photons take after interacting with one another.

Assuming these quantum circuits were competing against supercomputers capable of up to a quintillion (1018) floating-point operations per second (FLOPS), the researchers calculated that quantum supremacy could be reached with 208 qubits with IQP circuits, 420 qubits with QAOA circuits and 98 photons with boson sampling circuits.

How Many Qubits Are Needed For Quantum Supremacy?

[Journal Reference]: Quantum Journal


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Friday May 22 2020, @02:39AM (1 child)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Friday May 22 2020, @02:39AM (#997688) Journal

    https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/computing/hardware/quantum-inspire-launches [ieee.org]

    Ion traps and superconducting qubits are indeed leading the pack in numbers of qubits at the moment. However, with both systems it is pretty uncertain whether and how they can be scaled to a few hundred qubits or even to the millions of qubits that would be needed to do error correction, which is generally accepted as one of the few ways to build fault-tolerant quantum computers.

    If existing transistor fabrication technologies can be used to build a type of room-temperature qubit, then you could see millions, billions, or even trillions of qubits on a single chip relatively quickly. And that might be the scale needed to do anything useful, rather than 53 to 420 blazing qubits.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday May 22 2020, @05:05AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday May 22 2020, @05:05AM (#997726) Journal
    Noise would seem to be the key obstruction here. I recall that there are supposedly classical physical problems (like some sort of percolation problem - can you force a fluid through a matrix grid/sponge or not) that supposedly could solve certain hard computational problems in a finite amount of time. But the catch is that the noise of such systems would prevent them from being easy to calculate.

    I certainly don't buy that they can pull that off with 300 qubits even near absolute zero.