Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday May 22 2020, @07:11AM   Printer-friendly
from the so-business-as-usual? dept.

Nearly Half of Twitter Accounts Pushing to Reopen America May be Bots

There has been a huge upswell of Twitter bot activity since the start of the coronavirus pandemic, amplifying medical disinformation and the push to reopen America.

In a new study, the researchers have found that bots may account for between 45 and 60% of Twitter accounts discussing Covid-19. Many of those accounts were created in February and have since been spreading and amplifying misinformation, including false medical advice, conspiracy theories about the origin of the virus, and pushes to end stay-at-home orders and reopen America.

They follow well-worn patterns of coordinated influence campaigns, and their strategy is already working: since the beginning of the crisis, the researchers have observed a greater polarisation in Twitter discourse around the topic.

[...] Unfortunately, there are no easy solutions to this problem. Banning or removing accounts won't work, as more can be spun up for every one that is deleted. Banning accounts that spread inaccurate facts also won't solve anything. "A lot of disinformation is done through innuendo or done through illogical statements, and those are hard to discover," she says.

Carley says researchers, corporations, and the government need to coordinate better to come up with effective policies and practices for tamping this down. "I think we need some kind of general oversight group," she says. "Because no one group can do it alone."

Twitter accounts pushing to reopen America

[Source]: Misinformation and Disinformation Regarding Coronavirus in Social Media

What is your take on this?

Researchers: Nearly Half of Accounts Tweeting about Coronavirus are Likely Bots

Researchers: Nearly Half Of Accounts Tweeting About Coronavirus Are Likely Bots:

Nearly half of the Twitter accounts spreading messages on the social media platform about the coronavirus pandemic are likely bots, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University said Wednesday.

Researchers culled through more than 200 million tweets discussing the virus since January and found that about 45% were sent by accounts that behave more like computerized robots than humans.

It is too early to say conclusively which individuals or groups are behind the bot accounts, but researchers said the tweets appeared aimed at sowing division in America.

"We do know that it looks like it's a propaganda machine, and it definitely matches the Russian and Chinese playbooks, but it would take a tremendous amount of resources to substantiate that," said Kathleen Carley, a professor of computer science at Carnegie Mellon University who is conducting a study into bot-generated coronavirus activity on Twitter that has yet to be published.

[..] Reuters reported in March that Russian media have recently deployed a widespread disinformation campaign against the West to worsen the impact of the coronavirus to create panic and distrust.

Efforts to fight back against the spread of false information about COVID-19 come just as the federal government and election security experts keep a watchful eye on the November election.

American intelligence agencies concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election. Experts believe Russian actors will try to influence the 2020 vote as well, including by using social media to amplify their messages.


Original Submission #1 Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by JoeMerchant on Friday May 22 2020, @12:14PM (1 child)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Friday May 22 2020, @12:14PM (#997804)

    I think bots are just a fact of life now - on all sides.

    Hell, 10 years ago I entered a crappy little online contest and some kid in India decided he liked my entry, so he set up a voting bot that propelled me into the finalist round (I set up my own voting bot as well, but I didn't need to use mine because the Indian kid was already spam-voting me to the top...) 30 years ago I made a chat bot that would dial up a local BBS and post to their forums at 4 in the morning.

    If the forum permits bots, explicitly or implicitly (and most almost all online forums today are unable to completely filter bot posted content), you should expect bots to be present.

    Similarly, when you write to the President or your Congresscritters - you get a bot generated reply, whether in e-mail or paper/snail mail. And, even in the distant past - when staffers would reply, they generally were selecting from prepared script replies, sometimes not even as imaginative as today's better bots. I'm sure plenty of bot traffic flows in the other direction too.

    For that matter: what is junk mail? What percentage of the paper that reaches your snail-mail inbox is "bot generated"?

    Like SPAM? Thank a capitalist.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 5, Funny) by istartedi on Friday May 22 2020, @04:42PM

    by istartedi (123) on Friday May 22 2020, @04:42PM (#997906) Journal

    I think bots are just a fact of life now - on all sides.

    Sigh... it looks like I'll have to back to using reason to figure out whether or not I want to jump off a bridge, instead of doing it because all my associates are.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.