Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday May 27 2020, @04:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the second-time's-a-charm? dept.

US lawmakers get a second shot at forcing FBI agents to obtain a warrant before they leaf through web histories:

US lawmakers will get another vote on whether the FBI must get a warrant before agents can search Americans' search and web-browsing histories.

House reps Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) and Warren Davidson (R-OH) led the effort over the Memorial Day weekend to propose tacking an amendment onto the proposed USA FREEDOM Act, which is before the House of Representatives. The USA FREEDOM Act, if renewed as it stands, reauthorizes various USA PATRIOT Act surveillance programs.

One cause for concern is the lack of requirement, in section 215 of the legislation, for the Feds to get a search warrant before requesting access to people's internet activities from their ISPs.

Lofgren et al want the House to vote on amending the USA Freedom Act to include that requirement. The act has already passed the Senate without the warrant requirement, though if the House succeeds in tacking on the caveat, the Senate will have to consider it, too.

"After extensive bicameral, bipartisan deliberations, there will be a vote to include a final significant reform to Section 215 that protects Americans' civil liberties," Lofgren said in a statement on Tuesday.

"Our internet activity opens a window into the most sensitive areas of our private life, and, this week, Representatives will be able to vote to prevent the government from using Section 215 to collect the websites we visit, the videos we watch and the searches we make."

The House vote on the amendment will follow a similar attempt to add a warrant requirement in the Senate earlier this month, which fell by a single vote, and caused uproar. One of the authors of that proposed proviso in the Senate, Ron Wyden (D-OR), praised Lofgren for getting the issue on the floor of Congress again:

"I applaud Representative Lofgren for securing a vote on my amendment to ban warrantless collection of Americans' internet activity," the senator said. "There are few things more private than where a person goes on the internet, or what they search for online, so the government must obtain a warrant to get that information. I urge the House to pass it, and the Senate to follow suit."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Thursday May 28 2020, @06:22AM (3 children)

    by fustakrakich (6150) on Thursday May 28 2020, @06:22AM (#1000073) Journal

    Not really. Denial is a perfectly normal and the most effective defense mechanism against the unpleasantries of their faith.

    --
    La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
  • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Thursday May 28 2020, @08:13AM (2 children)

    by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Thursday May 28 2020, @08:13AM (#1000087)

    No, it's pretty weird

    • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Thursday May 28 2020, @01:39PM (1 child)

      by fustakrakich (6150) on Thursday May 28 2020, @01:39PM (#1000151) Journal

      Well, yeah, it is a documented medical issue, but it's not any "weirder" than a common cold.

      --
      La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
      • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Thursday May 28 2020, @08:57PM

        by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Thursday May 28 2020, @08:57PM (#1000281)

        Funny how it only affects Americans though.

        If our lot acted like that we'd vote 'em out. In fact we do, fairly regularly.