Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday May 28 2020, @06:50PM   Printer-friendly
from the For-the-Big-Sky dept.

Phys.org:

Research has shown that, while people in their 20s often leave rural communities, a higher percentage of young adults in their 30s choose rural communities, Schmitt-Wilson said. Still, most of the research on migration of young adults to rural communities focuses on "returners," or those choosing to move home to the community they were raised in, she added.

[...] The researchers found that while study participants were candid about challenges associated with life in rural areas of Montana—such as a lack of amenities and geographic and social isolation—they also highlighted a number of benefits.

"Those benefits included the quality of life they experience in their rural communities, including family-centered environments, low cost of living, unconditional support provided by community members, intergenerational friendships, increased sociability and unique opportunities for personal and professional growth available for young adults in rural communities," Schmitt-Wilson said.

If urban centers are in lockdown and their amenities are gone, would young people still choose city life or would places like rural Montana do?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Friday May 29 2020, @01:34PM (3 children)

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Friday May 29 2020, @01:34PM (#1000512) Journal

    It sounds like you live in Kalispell, Missoula, or Bozeman. Most of the rest of the state is the same as it always was. Go to Paradise, Libby, Eureka, Choteau, Malta, Wibaux, Jordan, Townsend, White Sulphur Springs, or Broadus and not much has changed. It's a big state in a big country. Plenty of room for people who want a rural life.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by mr_bad_influence on Friday May 29 2020, @02:30PM (2 children)

    by mr_bad_influence (3854) on Friday May 29 2020, @02:30PM (#1000535)

    I have been to all of those places and then some. Thing is, when I came to MT, all it took was a knock on a door and ask for permission to hunt or fish and be granted access. Now land that has been in families for generations is being sold to the wealthy who lock out the average guy. They want to sell the fish and game to outfitters for a profit. The elk congregate on these properties due to pressure on public lands. Then they complain because all the elk over graze the ranch. Fish and wildlife are supposed to belong to all the people, but only if you have enough money. Montana is rapidly losing their welcoming and friendly folks to the wealthy.

    • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Friday May 29 2020, @10:03PM

      by Phoenix666 (552) on Friday May 29 2020, @10:03PM (#1000800) Journal

      I hear you. the fastest way to fix it is to levy a property tax that increases logrithmically with acreage, with family ranches and farms grandfathered.

      If all else fails, canada due north is vast and empty.

      --
      Washington DC delenda est.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 29 2020, @10:05PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 29 2020, @10:05PM (#1000801)

      Look, you had plenty of time to get your Montana bribe into Zinke while he was still leading Interior. Don't cry to us that you lost your chance now that he's resigned in disgrace.