Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday May 28 2020, @06:50PM   Printer-friendly
from the For-the-Big-Sky dept.

Phys.org:

Research has shown that, while people in their 20s often leave rural communities, a higher percentage of young adults in their 30s choose rural communities, Schmitt-Wilson said. Still, most of the research on migration of young adults to rural communities focuses on "returners," or those choosing to move home to the community they were raised in, she added.

[...] The researchers found that while study participants were candid about challenges associated with life in rural areas of Montana—such as a lack of amenities and geographic and social isolation—they also highlighted a number of benefits.

"Those benefits included the quality of life they experience in their rural communities, including family-centered environments, low cost of living, unconditional support provided by community members, intergenerational friendships, increased sociability and unique opportunities for personal and professional growth available for young adults in rural communities," Schmitt-Wilson said.

If urban centers are in lockdown and their amenities are gone, would young people still choose city life or would places like rural Montana do?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by JoeMerchant on Friday May 29 2020, @02:15PM (4 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Friday May 29 2020, @02:15PM (#1000530)

    education has changed because of this thing

    Education is a great deal more than Readin, Ritin and Rithmetic. If the majority of schoolchildren shift to 100% home schooling, we're looking at a cultural revolution in 5-10 years, and I don't think it will be - on balance - for the good. School is where you learn how to deal with all the other assholes that live in the world, learn how much of an asshole you are yourself, and decide how much of an asshole you will continue to be in your adult life. Without that melting pot experience: cliques, bullies, bathroom muggings, drug deals, defiance of authority, punishment, evasion of punishment, etc. the children will grow up sheltered, ignorant and clash with each other as adults instead.

    The two-horse town I was considering living in had a real problem getting staff for food services. Waitresses at the best restaurant on main street didn't know how to pronounce croissant, but with some OJT they could tell you it was "a sort of funny biscuit looking thing." Chillis had to delay opening for nearly 4 months before they could adequately train staff to cook and serve at minimum franchise acceptable levels. They were, on the other hand, host to one of the biggest rodeos in the state.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 29 2020, @08:10PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 29 2020, @08:10PM (#1000723)

    Learning to interact with a broad section of society is a useful skill, but one of the things you learn from that is that certain classes of people are best COMPLETELY AVOIDED.
    How many years of mixing with thugs or low-goal people do you think is appropriate to learn the lesson? Most people would say that, on balance, your child is better off spending more time around people who have their s*** together and have morals. That's the example you want for them. Not bad examples. You don't want to normalize failure behavior.

    • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Saturday May 30 2020, @03:31AM

      by JoeMerchant (3937) on Saturday May 30 2020, @03:31AM (#1000899)

      How many years of mixing with thugs or low-goal people do you think is appropriate to learn the lesson?

      More than one, after about three I managed to shed my private school ignorance.

      --
      🌻🌻 [google.com]
  • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Friday May 29 2020, @10:10PM (1 child)

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Friday May 29 2020, @10:10PM (#1000805) Journal

    I don't know what your experience of public school was, but mine was not interested in bringing out the best in the students but rather bludgeoning them into a very small box. that was out west. having served on the schoolboard in brooklyn for years, I can say with authority that they are even worse than that.

    If we have a chance to teach our kids the wonder of creativity and STEM and becoming self-directed, we should jump at it. we can't let public school teachers stunt our children anymore.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
    • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Saturday May 30 2020, @03:35AM

      by JoeMerchant (3937) on Saturday May 30 2020, @03:35AM (#1000901)

      Home schooling has been an option for decades... we've taken that option off and on when public was worse than nothing, but... home is no substitute for peer learning. I can see how the midwest would be pretty hopeless in the public school department, but schoolboards are one of those nearly accessible political forums where, if you've got a stay at home mom (or dad) with a bit of excess time/energy, you really can start to make a difference. If you've got three or four good people with the time and energy to get elected to the schoolboard - well positioned around a county, you can actually take over and start to make major improvements.

      --
      🌻🌻 [google.com]