Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Friday May 29 2020, @03:28AM   Printer-friendly
from the customer-disservice dept.

US cable subscribers are still being 'ripped off' by creeping price increases – and this lot has had enough:

In many ways it’s a rite of passage in America: being ripped off by your cable company and trying to figure out how they did it. Now a lawsuit against Charter Communications is seeking to uncover just that.

The biggest scam of all – pressuring or forcing subscribers to “rent” the clunky, technologically outdated cable box at a greatly inflated price – is still in place, despite a brief effort by the FCC in 2016 to shut it down.

And then there are hidden costs – such as “broadcast TV fees” and “regional sports fees” – raking in tens of millions of dollars in pure profit for unscrupulous cable companies, despite Consumer Reports focusing on the topic for a number of years, and now Congress even starting to pay attention.

But although we have all grown used to our cable fees rocketing the second you are off the special two-year contract rate, requiring you to call up the company and threaten to move to a competitor until you are offered the next incredible special deal, Charter may have pushed things too far with its latest special offer: a two-year flat fee deal that somehow, it is claimed, grew more expensive every month.

Five Charter Communications customers, based in Ohio and Kentucky, have formally accused [PDF] the company of a bait-and-switch scam for its cable TV service. The biz advertised a fixed monthly rate, they say, but far from being fixed, every few months it cost a little more.

Are the cable companies to blame, or the sports and movie channels that are charging more?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 29 2020, @07:05AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 29 2020, @07:05AM (#1000443)

    Those aren't good guys. They're just less savvy at politics and expanded into many domains so more people are in competition with them (meaning out to tear them down). Cable companies just deal with communication and media. The big tech companies do software, do hosting, do logistics, do hardware, do news (scanning existing news sources and reformatting the data so you don't need to visit those news sites), do mapping, etc... A larger surface area means a larger target.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 29 2020, @03:21PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 29 2020, @03:21PM (#1000562)

    The government's intent to go after Google and Amazon is purely to make things worse for the consumer. They don't like how these companies do a good job serving consumers when compared to the legacy industries who do a terrible job.