Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday June 01 2020, @04:21AM   Printer-friendly
from the ***=|*|*=*|=*==||*|*=|*=*|*=**|=*==||*==|**|=****=|**=*|** dept.

[20200601_233900 UTC: updated to elide a couple paragraphs and update suggestion to read original article.--martyb]

US court grants permission to recover Marconi telegraph from Titanic wreckage:

When RMS Titanic struck an iceberg on April 14, 1912, crew members sent out numerous distress signals to any other ships in the vicinity using what was then a relatively new technology: a Marconi wireless telegraph system. More than 1,500 passengers and crew perished when the ship sank a few hours later. Now, in what is likely to be a controversial decision, a federal judge has approved a salvage operation to retrieve the telegraph from the deteriorating wreckage, The Boston Globe has reported.

Lawyers for the company RMS Titanic Inc.—which owns more than 5,000 artifacts salvaged from the wreck—filed a request in US District Court in Alexandria, Virginia, arguing that the wireless telegraph should be salvaged because the ship's remains are likely to collapse sometime in the next several years, rendering "the world's most famous radio" inaccessible. US District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith concurred in her ruling, noting that salvaging the telegraph "will contribute to the legacy left by the indelible loss of the Titanic, those who survived, and those who gave their lives in the sinking."

However, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is fiercely opposed to the salvage mission. The agency argues in court documents that the telegraph should be left undisturbed, since it is likely to be surrounded "by the mortal remains of more than 1500 people." Judge Smith countered in her decision that the proposed expedition meets international requirements: for instance, it is justified on scientific and cultural grounds and has taken into account any potential damage to the wreck.

[...] This latest ruling is bound to generate more controversy, given that the expedition's plans call for "surgically" removing the telegraph from the hull, risking further damage. (It's believed that the telegraph is located in a deck house near the grand staircase.) According to an Associated Press report, the company's 60-page plan calls for an uncrewed submersible to pass through a skylight. If that doesn't work, the expedition would cut through the roof, which is already heavily corroded. Then a "suction dredge" will remove any loose silt, and the submersible's arms will cut through any electrical cords.

The linked story at Ars Technica goes into considerable detail on the history of how several famous people vied for the claim of creator of telegraphy and wireless communications — well worth reading the entire article.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by coolgopher on Monday June 01 2020, @09:16AM (2 children)

    by coolgopher (1157) on Monday June 01 2020, @09:16AM (#1001655)

    Cremation is quite a waste of energy and also polluting. Have a look at composting [recompose.life] instead if you want a rounder circle of life.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=2, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Monday June 01 2020, @02:52PM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Monday June 01 2020, @02:52PM (#1001708) Journal

    Or you could be buried at sea.

    I'm gonna have myself frozen in carbonite and placed in the foyer of one of my kids' home.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 01 2020, @04:51PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 01 2020, @04:51PM (#1001772)

    The energy and pollution is negligible. The composting movement is a feel-good scam, like much of the so-called carbon-neutral company press-releases that were popular a few years ago.