Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday June 05 2020, @02:14AM   Printer-friendly
from the amaizing-inauguration-of-the-liquid-lunch dept.

UNM researchers document the first use of maize in Mesoamerica:

The research, titled Early isotopic evidence for maize as a staple grain in the Americas and published by Prufer and his team in the journal Science Advances, reveals new information about when the now-ubiquitous maize became a key part of people’s diets. Until now, little was known about when humans living in the tropics of Central America first started eating corn. But the “unparalleled” discovery of remarkably well-preserved ancient human skeletons in Central American rock shelters has revealed when corn became a key part of people’s diet in the Americas.

[...] Maize was domesticated from teosinte, a wild grass growing in the lower reaches of the Balsas River Valley of Central Mexico, around 9,000 years ago. There is evidence maize was first cultivated in the Maya lowlands around 6,500 years ago, at about the same time that it appears along the Pacific coast of Mexico. But there is no evidence that maize was a staple grain at that time.

The first use of corn may have been for an early form of liquor.

Why eat tortillas when you can make booze?

Journal Reference:
Douglas J. Kennett, Keith M. Prufer, Brendan J. Culleton, et al. Early isotopic evidence for maize as a staple grain in the Americas [open], Science Advances (DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aba3245)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Arik on Friday June 05 2020, @03:29AM

    by Arik (4543) on Friday June 05 2020, @03:29AM (#1003546) Journal
    That was pretty cutting edge in 1997.

    Today we're kind of past that. As in, thinking more about just how deep the subsequent criticism really managed to cut into the thesis; and by contrast how much of it manages to still seem reasonable nearly three decades later.

    It was well-written and in my not so humble opinion remains reasonably strong as a result; but that means you have to read it carefully and take it particularly seriously when the author mentions limitations and vulnerabilities of his own viewpoint.
    --
    If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3