Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday June 05 2020, @07:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the toiling-away dept.

The day is dawning on a four-day work week:

A true four-day workweek entails full-timers clocking about 30 hours instead of 40. There are many reasons why this is appealing today: families are struggling to cover child care in the absence of daycares and schools; workplaces are trying to reduce the number of employees congregating in offices each day; and millions of people have lost their jobs.

A shorter work week could allow parents to cobble together child care, allow workplaces to stagger attendance and, theoretically, allow the available work to be divided among more people who need employment.

The most progressive shorter work week entails no salary reductions. This sounds crazy, but it rests on peer-reviewed research into shorter work weeks, which finds workers can be as productive in 30 hours as they are in 40, because they waste less time and are better-rested.

30 hours is for pikers. The !Kung work about 20.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by bzipitidoo on Saturday June 06 2020, @12:55AM (3 children)

    by bzipitidoo (4388) on Saturday June 06 2020, @12:55AM (#1004028) Journal

    Actually I do know somewhat of these things, enough to know that history class did gloss over things a bit. It's not that the research really convinced them. A slave driver is nigh impossible to convince that more man hours no matter how they're gotten, does not mean more production, and production that matters. If losing the Civil War can't convince them, what could? It's more like they used the research as cover, so they would not have to admit that they made concessions to unions. You know, like all these fines that financial organizations pay for their crimes, but without admitting to any wrongdoing. Some are really stuck on that. Refuse to admit to or apologize for anything ever, because that looks weak.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 06 2020, @01:02AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 06 2020, @01:02AM (#1004030)

    Given the hyper-litigious business environment, and how politics and law make weakness a fatal error, it's not surprising they never admit anything.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 06 2020, @03:33AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 06 2020, @03:33AM (#1004065)

    And yet everyone knows both sides of the equation.

    When someone blows smoke up your ass and cheaps out on what they promised you, how do you behave? Like a motivated employee? Please.

    So why do they still do it? They must truly believe they're convincing you that shit sandwich is a Trump steak.

    • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Wednesday June 10 2020, @07:03PM

      by Thexalon (636) on Wednesday June 10 2020, @07:03PM (#1005943)

      They must truly believe they're convincing you that shit sandwich is a Trump steak.

      Well, to be fair, my understanding is that those who have eaten Trump steaks have concluded it's hard to tell the difference between those two.

      --
      The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.