Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Wednesday June 10 2020, @05:07AM   Printer-friendly
from the the-next-generation-of-forensics dept.

High definition scans and image recognition are combined to produce a unique signature for any part:

Everything needed to trace, track or certify any individual manufactured part is already present on the part itself, according to Brian Crowley, CEO of Alitheon, a startup company focused on object traceability. The surface detail of a manufactured part is unique in the same way fingerprints are, he says. And, importantly, off-the-shelf imaging technology — notably including the cameras in our phones — is now capable of accurately capturing this distinctive surface-level detail. The result is a new possibility for identifying parts, arguably better and more reliable than serial numbers. Alitheon’s technology for using this surface detail for part ID is called “FeaturePrint.”

Sorry if this seems like a soylvertizement--I don't have any connection to the company, it just seemed like an interesting new technology, with wide-ranging consequences. While initially this might be used internal to factories that need to track every part of an assembly and avoid bad parts or counterfeits slipping into production, other applications seem possible. For example, there is no point in filing the serial number off that gun, unless you also deface all the surfaces on *all* the external and internal parts.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 10 2020, @06:13AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 10 2020, @06:13AM (#1005690)

    Well, according to the article, they did every single one of those tests and they can still figure this out.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by bradley13 on Wednesday June 10 2020, @08:05AM

    by bradley13 (3053) on Wednesday June 10 2020, @08:05AM (#1005721) Homepage Journal

    The only test in the article that actually made any sense was the "grit blasting". This was tested on a titanium part, which is obviously not representative of most products, and they don't say how they test was carried out.

    All criticism aside: if the required level of photography really is within the reach of the average cell-phone camera, this technology is pretty impressive. It's just not going to replace serial numbers, but might have other applications, for example, in forensics.

    --
    Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.