Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday June 16 2020, @04:53PM   Printer-friendly
from the first-world-health-care? dept.

COVID-19 hospitalizations could mean significant out-of-pocket medical costs for many Americans:

For their study, the researchers analyzed out-of-pocket costs for pneumonia and other upper respiratory illness hospitalizations from January 2016 through August 2019 as a potential indicator of likely COVID-19 costs. The researchers found that these out-of-pocket costs were particularly high for so-called consumer-directed health plans -- which typically feature lower premiums, compared to standard plans, but higher deductibles that can be paid via tax-advantaged health savings accounts.

[...] Many big-name health insurers have voluntarily waived out-of-pocket cost sharing for COVID-19 treatment. However, employer-sponsored "self-insured" health insurance plans are not required to adhere to such waivers. Thus, tens of millions of Americans have high-deductible insurance plans that, in cases of COVID-19 hospitalization, may expose them to relatively high out-of-pocket costs.

[...] To get a sense of the likely cost burden on patients hospitalized for COVID-19, Eisenberg and colleagues examined de-identified insurance claims for 34,395 unique hospitalizations from January 2016 through August 2019. They looked at out-of-pocket costs incurred by people who had been hospitalized during the 2016-2019 study period with pneumonia, acute bronchitis, lower respiratory infections, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. (Claims data on actual COVID-19 cases were not available in the database at the time of the study.) The cases examined did not include those for people ages 65 and over, who are normally covered by Medicare. The out-of-pocket costs included deductible payments, copayments, and coinsurance payments.

The researchers found that average out-of-pocket spending for the 2016-2019 study period for these respiratory hospitalizations was $1,961 for patients with consumer-directed plans versus $1,653 for patients in traditional, usually smaller-deductible plans.

The out-of-pocket cost gap was lowest for older patients age 56 to 64, and greatest -- $2,237 vs. $1,685 -- for patients 21 and younger. The analysis was not designed to examine why the cost gap varied inversely with patient age, but one possible explanation proposed by the researchers was that, since younger patients are healthier on average, their hospitalizations may reflect more serious and thus more costly illness.

Journal Reference: Matthew D. Eisenberg, Colleen L. Barry, Cameron Schilling, Alene Kennedy-Hendricks. Financial Risk for COVID-19-like Respi- ratory Hospitalizations in Consumer-Directed Health Plans, American Journal of Preventive Medicine (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.05.008


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by linuxrocks123 on Tuesday June 16 2020, @11:05PM (2 children)

    by linuxrocks123 (2557) on Tuesday June 16 2020, @11:05PM (#1008899) Journal

    There's lower overhead with Medicare, but that private insurance overhead also equals oversight, so I think what's being missed is that more unnecessary testing gets done with Medicare since they know they won't get denied. Private insurance companies have a strong incentive to deny claims for bogus shit. Medicare doesn't.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 16 2020, @11:22PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 16 2020, @11:22PM (#1008910)

    AFAIK Medicare has strong limits on what treatments can be billed by hospitals for what condition. There are so many customers on Medicare that there are optimized processes in hospitals to deal with it.
    Private insurers on the other hand can deny claims for random stuff, but then the patient is still on the hook to the provider.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 16 2020, @11:32PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 16 2020, @11:32PM (#1008915)

    Private insurance companies have a strong incentive to deny claims as often as they can get away with, whether they are medically necessary or not, to maximize their profits

    There. FTFY.