Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday June 19 2020, @11:50AM   Printer-friendly
from the catch-a-baby-star-and-put-it-in-your-pocket-♫♫ dept.

Astronomers just discovered the youngest ever 'baby' dead star:

A suite of space-based telescopes operated by NASA and the European Space Agency have discovered the youngest known magnetar to date. At just 240 years old, this extreme, cosmic infant could help astronomers understand how these dead, dense stars come to be and how they evolve.

In a study, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters on Wednesday, researcher describe Swift J1818.0-1607, a very young magnetar first spotted by NASA's Neil Gehrel's Swift Observatory on March 12 after it let out a mighty, explosive burst of X-rays. Magnetars are a rare kind of neutron star (the collapsed cores of huge stars) with extreme magnetic fields. They pack a huge amount of mass into a tiny space, which generates a huge amount of weird physical phenomena. Their magnetic fields can be up to 1,000 times stronger than your regular, run-of-the-mill neutron star.

[...] This particularly[sic] magnetar is only around 16,000 light-years from the Earth -- practically our backyard -- and located in the constellation Sagittarius. Astronomers have only detected a few dozen magnetars and none have ever been detected so shortly after they have formed.

Journal Reference:
Zhongyang Wang. Reactant-Transport Engineering Approach to High-Power Direct Borohydride Fuel Cells, Cell Reports Physical Science (DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100084)

This magnetar is 16,000 light years away from Earth.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 19 2020, @03:31PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 19 2020, @03:31PM (#1010073)

    ...waking up to a story about a dead "baby".

    Can't the editors come up with a less offensive description of short-lived stellar phenomena?

  • (Score: 2) by tizan on Friday June 19 2020, @04:17PM

    by tizan (3245) on Friday June 19 2020, @04:17PM (#1010088)

    It is a baby "dead" not a dead "baby" ...so its a cute a baby zombie.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 20 2020, @06:34AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 20 2020, @06:34AM (#1010289)

    Ncommander on Win95? Sort of like a dead baby. Or, operating system. But stars, even baby ones, have to suck enough to induce nuclear fusion. Win95 never sucked that much, although it was a near thing.

  • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Saturday June 20 2020, @03:51PM

    by Gaaark (41) on Saturday June 20 2020, @03:51PM (#1010403) Journal
    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---