D&D Looks To Cut Down On Racial Differences Going Forward
Races and classes have been the central aspects of character creation since the beginning of Dungeons & Dragons – well, not quite the beginning, since Elf used to be a class in original D&D. However, based on a twitter thread by D&D's Jeremy Crawford, it looks like Wizards of the Coast will be moving toward less drastic racial mechanics, especially in regard to races traditionally considered "monster races."
Crawford pointed out the differences between the orcs found in Volo's Guide to Monsters and those found in the Exandria and Eberron settings, saying that the latter reflects the direction that the D&D team is headed in regard to monsters. The Exandria and Eberron orcs lack the -2 penalty to Intelligence and the required evil alignment. This reflects the fact that in these settings orcs are mostly considered another type of people – with all the varieties in personality and temperament that come with that – rather than fodder for player characters to fight.
[...] It is worth noting that this comes on the heels of a Twitter discussion on the racist history of orcs, initially spawned by a screenshot of the description of orcs in Volo's Guide to Monsters. Tolkien initially portrayed orcs as caricatures of Mongolians, and orcs have been racial stereotypes of other races over and over (see World of Warcraft or Bright). Dungeons & Dragons is not immune to this – even outside of the orc issue, races like the Vistani appear as Romani stereotypes.
Diversity and Dungeons & Dragons
Throughout the 50-year history of D&D, some of the peoples in the game—orcs and drow being two of the prime examples—have been characterized as monstrous and evil, using descriptions that are painfully reminiscent of how real-world ethnic groups have been and continue to be denigrated. That's just not right, and it's not something we believe in. Despite our conscious efforts to the contrary, we have allowed some of those old descriptions to reappear in the game. We recognize that to live our values, we have to do an even better job in handling these issues. If we make mistakes, our priority is to make things right.
See also: Dungeons & Dragons Designers Clarify How Gnolls Differ From Other D&D Creatures
Related: Gender and Appearance Stereotypes Travel to World of Warcraft
(Score: 4, Interesting) by Booga1 on Saturday June 20 2020, @11:27PM (3 children)
It's come full circle in some computer RPGs. Consider Planescape: Torment, where you can not only negotiate your way out of fights, but you can gain new allies as well. Fail to negotiate what SHOULD have been a simple transaction and be forced to slog through a nasty sewer for less reward than you would have gotten if you had just talked your way through the situation. I never finished it, but I should probably try again. It was pretty awesome.
Another one I haven't played through, but similar: I hear Undertale has options for both pacifist and genocide runs in the game with different endings depending on what you've done.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by loonycyborg on Sunday June 21 2020, @10:49AM
Such games are still extremely rare since just spamming combat for rewards with diminishing returns just to waste people's time is more economically efficient from "business" standpoint. That is it results in more play time in exchange for less developer/writer/voice-actor time. And having inherently "evil" races is necessary for such content factories because it saves time on writing and lets you hire cheaper writers.
(Score: 2) by looorg on Sunday June 21 2020, @02:20PM
I remember Planescape: Torment it was sort of a game changer when it came out, so many games before had included text and dialogue but it was quite frankly optional and most people just didn't bother with it since it always more or less ended in the same -- go out and slay something evil and then return to me. In PT you had to read, so you could pick the right dialogue options -- if you picked wrong it might be combat time and you would have a very high risk of dying and as noted for worse rewards. This might be why it wasn't as popular as say Balder's Gate or Icewind Dale since both of those was more about following the now standardized computer RPG formula of killing monsters to gain loot and xp to become more powerful so you could slay more monster for more rewards and better loot (repeat).
I recall some of the first like remakes of (A)D&D games for the computers from SSI/TSR such as Pool of Radiance where the programmers was very lazy. So they had just consulted the monster manual and I recall some fights got ridiculous as it would spawn in things like 1d4 x 100 critters (and Gnolls and such) and such -- so much so that sometime the game would just crash or the fight would take forever and due to designs of how the magic system worked you would quickly run out of spells and then it was just a matter of if the warrior would survive long enough. Champions / Deathknights of Krynn (and the other "Gold box" games) and a few others was probably a core reason why me, and many of my friends, upgraded our A500 machines with 512kb of extra RAM cause it was a requirement of to just run the game.
(Score: 4, Interesting) by Kalas on Sunday June 21 2020, @07:39PM
I wholeheartedly recommend Undertale to any fan of RPGs. I can't think of any other game where I can't find anything to nitpick about, and believe me, I love to complain even about things I like. Without writing a whole wall of text about what's to love about it, I will say that is true and more. The true pacifist ending (best possible ending, not obtainable on first playthrough) and genocide get the most attention, but there's a wide range of neutral endings ranging from pacifist to "killed most people in fights you couldn't flee" each with different end results for the player and/or monsters of the underground. And I just adore how the game subverts your expectations of a typical classic RPG in so many ways. Because of that I don't think anyone could fully appreciate it if it was their first RPG experience.
And if you like that there's Deltarune, not as a sequel but more as a re-imagining of the setting and characters, with a different message I'm not quite sure of because I only played Chapter 1. The main thing I got out of it so far is that Ralsei is the cutest fluffball ever to cast a spell.