Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Sunday June 21 2020, @09:49AM   Printer-friendly
from the lego-my…LEGO dept.

Using LEGO to test children's ability to visualize and rotate 3D shapes in space:

Researchers at the University of California San Diego have developed a test that uses children’s ability to assemble LEGO pieces to assess their spatial visualization ability. Spatial visualization is the ability to visualize 3D shapes in one’s mind, which is tied to increased GPAs and graduation rates in STEM college students.

At the college level, a widely used assessment is the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Rotations, or PSVT:R, which is a 20-minute timed test consisting of a series of multiple-choice questions that are geared towards students 13 and older. Van Den Einde and Delson wanted to develop an assessment that would be more suitable and engaging for students at lower grade levels. They turned to LEGO, which was designed with that younger age range in mind and is familiar to many children. To pass the test, students have to assemble a set of LEGO pieces into a specific shape, such as a whale or a small plane, while only being given a picture of the final shape but no step-by-step instructions. The time it takes students to build the correct solution is the metric used for assessment.

[...] In order to validate the test, the researchers had students in two freshman engineering graphics courses take both the LEGO assembly test and the PSVT:R. Students took the tests both at the beginning and end of the quarter. During the course, they were trained with the Spatial Viz app. Test results show a statistically significant correlation between outcomes on the LEGO test and the PSVT:R.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by looorg on Sunday June 21 2020, @02:54PM (1 child)

    by looorg (578) on Sunday June 21 2020, @02:54PM (#1010656)

    Didn't this use to be, or perhaps still is, a core part of (or subset of) intelligence testing -- visual spatial testing. You get a drawn a picture of a shape and then they tell you to rotate it say X degrees along some axis and then they wonder what it will look like and you are offered a few choices or you are supposed to draw it yourself. They assume symmetry so it's not like completely different on the backside. It might have fallen out of favor tho since one of the core results was that men in general was a lot better at it then women.
    This is just part of the all things old become new if you just slap some new tech on top of it. I guess we just didn't have the fancy LEGO models that the youth of today have with all their 3D models and VR. Get away from my lawn!

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 22 2020, @06:09PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 22 2020, @06:09PM (#1011188)

    That test never did a very good job of testing visualization. It's entirely possible to ace that section without the ability to visualize and without cheating. It tests the visual-spatial sketchpad, and there are different ways in which people manage to do it. Most people visualize, but there's some folks, myself included, that convert things over to motions or a series of directions and pass it like that.

    One of the issues that crops up in assessment is when people are able to pass despite not having the ability that the test question is supposed to be measuring. A test item like that is worthless as it can't predictably measure the intended ability.