Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday June 22 2020, @10:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the ill-wind? dept.

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/19/tech/north-face-facebook-ads/index.html:

Outdoor apparel brand The North Face has become the best-known company yet to commit to an advertising boycott of Facebook in light of the social media platform's handling of misinformation and hate speech — a move that could open the door for other brands to do the same.

The brand's decision responds to a pressure campaign by top civil rights groups, including the NAACP and the Anti-Defamation League, known as #StopHateForProfit, which on Wednesday began calling for advertisers to suspend their marketing on Facebook in the month of July.

"We're in," The North Face tweeted. "We're out @Facebook #StopHateForProfit."

Hours later, outdoor equipment retailer REI said it will join the boycott.

[...] The activists demanding change face an enormously ambitious task. Facebook is the second-largest player in US digital marketing after Google, and last year generated $69.7 billion from advertising worldwide.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Troll) by system32 on Tuesday June 23 2020, @08:23AM (6 children)

    by system32 (5465) on Tuesday June 23 2020, @08:23AM (#1011470)

    Should we... Should we tell him about the much larger problem of black on black violence? Oh right, nevermind, doesn't fit the narrative... Sorry, forget the kids that were murdered in drive-by shootings over the last week...CNN must have forgot to mention that.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Troll=1, Insightful=1, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 23 2020, @09:28AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 23 2020, @09:28AM (#1011481)

    What makes you think he's not aware of that? Isn't people-on-people violence exactly what you'd expect if law enforcement fails to protect?

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by PiMuNu on Tuesday June 23 2020, @02:21PM (3 children)

    by PiMuNu (3823) on Tuesday June 23 2020, @02:21PM (#1011564)

    There is a huge moral difference between a civilian committing violence and a police officer.

    Police officers have special powers in law, granted under the assumption that they will be used to "protect and serve".

    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 23 2020, @02:36PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 23 2020, @02:36PM (#1011574)

      There is absolutely no moral difference. The difference is entirely legal.

      • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 23 2020, @03:05PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 23 2020, @03:05PM (#1011588)

        That is exactly the difference he is talking about.

        When a citizen kills someone it is murder, manslaugher, or at least criminal negligence.

        When a cop does it, it is an accident, or completely justified.

        The law enforcers should be held to a higher standard, not a lower one, they are the ones with the training.

      • (Score: 2) by PiMuNu on Wednesday June 24 2020, @12:25PM

        by PiMuNu (3823) on Wednesday June 24 2020, @12:25PM (#1011938)

        No, I think there is a moral difference. A police officer has taken a vow to "protect and serve" or some such, whereas a civilian has not.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 24 2020, @03:27AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 24 2020, @03:27AM (#1011847)

    Only if you're a racist idiot trying to pretend you're just all about the facts.