Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Tuesday June 23 2020, @01:28AM   Printer-friendly
from the when-can-we-stick-a-fork-in-it? dept.

NASA thinks it's time to return to Neptune with its Trident mission:

It's been 30 years since NASA's Voyager 2 spacecraft flew past the gas giant and its largest moon, and that flyby posed more questions than it answered. Maybe we'll get some answers in 2038, when the positions of Jupiter, Neptune and Triton will be just right for a mission.

NASA is deliberating over the next mission in its Discovery Program, narrowing it down to four possibilities: a mission to study Venus' atmosphere, one to observe volcanic activity on Jupiter's moon Io, one to map Venus' surface and study its geology, and one to explore Neptune's moon Triton.

The conceptual mission to Triton is called Trident, and it's competing with the other three to become a full-fledged mission.

[...] The Trident mission would launch in 2026, taking advantage of a rare and efficient alignment between Jupiter, Neptune, and Triton in 2038. It would do gravity assist fly-bys of Earth, Venus and Jupiter before continuing on to Neptune. All of those fly-bys will propel the spacecraft toward its goal. Then it would perform a fly-by of Neptune and a fly-by of Triton. Sadly, the mission profile doesn't include any orbiters or landers.

The spacecraft's unique path would mean that even with only one fly-by of Triton, it would be able to map the surface of the moon almost completely. It would also be able to fly within 500 km (310 miles) of the surface, right through Triton's thin atmosphere.

[...] The Triton mission is only a concept at this point. And it's competing with three other missions for selection. By summer 2021, NASA will have narrowed the choice down to two finalists, or possibly one winner.

More information:
Mitchell, Prockter, et al. Implementation of Trident: A Discovery Class Mission to Triton. 50th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Abstracts. (2019) www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2019/pdf/3200.pdf


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bzipitidoo on Wednesday June 24 2020, @03:39AM

    by bzipitidoo (4388) on Wednesday June 24 2020, @03:39AM (#1011852) Journal

    I agree that orbiters would be better. But, if we can't have that, is it possible to have a trajectory that encounters Neptune twice within a relatively short time of 10 years or so between encounters? Not that another probe into interstellar space wouldn't have some value too.

    Really though, we ought to put more effort into propulsion systems, so we have more options. Or, could we miniaturize probes and cut the weight way down so that existing tech can propel them with, say, twice the speed? Longevity is another area to work on. Planet 9, if it exists, is so far away we can't even send a probe there and still have it in working order when it arrives. I would prefer faster, so that by the time Planet 9 is found (5 more years, maybe?), a probe readied and launched (another 3 years?), and arrives (at least 50 years with current tech, if it's near perihelion), I will still be alive to see it.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2