Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday June 23 2020, @06:11PM   Printer-friendly
from the for-the-well-ARM-ed-system dept.

Ampere's Product List: 80 Cores, up to 3.3 GHz at 250 W; 128 Core in Q4

The Ampere Altra range, as part of today's release, will offer parts from 32 cores up to 80 cores, up to 3.3 GHz, with a variety of TDPs up to 250 W. As we've described in our previous news items on the chip, this is an Arm v8.2 core with a few 8.3+8.5 features, offers support for FP16 and INT8, supports 8 channels of DDR4-3200 ECC at 2 DIMMs per channel, and up to 4 TiB of memory per socket in a 1P or 2P configuration. Each CPU will offer 128 PCIe 4.0 lanes, 32 of which can be used for socket-to-socket communications implemented with the CCIX protocol over PCIe. This means 50 GB/s in each direction, and 192 PCIe 4.0 lanes in a dual socket system for add-in cards. Each of the PCIe lanes can bifurcate down to x2.

[...] Previously Ampere had stated they were going for 80 cores at 3.0 GHz at 210 W, however the Q80-33 is pushing that frequency another 300 MHz for another 40 W, and we understand that the tapeout of silicon from TSMC performed better than expected, hence this new top processor.

[...] If that wasn't enough, Ampere dropped a sizeable nugget into our pre-announcement briefing. The company is set to launch a 128-core version of Altra later this year.

This will be a new silicon design, beyond Ampere's initial layout of 80 cores for Altra, however Ampere states that while they are using the same platform as the regular Altra, they have done extensive tweaking and optimizations within the mesh interconnect for Altra Max to hide the additional contention that might occur when using the same main memory speeds.

Altra Max will be socket and pin-compatible with Altra, also support dual socket deployments, and Ampere states that the silicon will be ready for early sampling with partners in Q4, and is looking to move into high volume in mid-2021.

Previously: Ampere Launches its First ARM-Based Server Processors in Challenge to Intel
80-Core Arm CPU To Bring Lower Power, Higher Density To A Rack Near You

Related: Amazon Announces 64-core Graviton2 Arm CPU
Marvell Announces ThunderX3, an ARM Server CPU With 96 Cores, 384 Threads
AMD and Intel Have a Formidable New Foe (Amazon)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Tuesday June 23 2020, @11:46PM (1 child)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Tuesday June 23 2020, @11:46PM (#1011766)

    AMD took those questions too far, and got hit with a class action lawsuit. Dark times.

    I played the options market once, started out with a $100 stake, doubled it, took that and doubled it again, next go round I got more lucky and tripled from $400 to $1200 - I think one of those plays was Amazon circa 2005... forgot the others, anyway... final play was AMD calls in early 2006ish - yeah, bust. They were looking really good with their low power and 64 bit consumer parts advantages back then, but it all came crashing down while I was holding calls.

    Pretty much everything they make now is x64.

    I guess, when you think about it, even if your VM is only 32 bit, the host machine wants to be 64 bit so they can run tons of 'em.

    Also back in the 2006 timeframe we had some IBM sales suits come through and pitch their "flex core" lease model to us. Didn't make sense for us since we intended to actually 100% use whatever processors we had access to, but for businesses who were unsure of when/if they would scale up their IT needs IBM basically proposed a rack system with massively excess capacity, but you only pay for what you are using - when your needs increase, the capacity is there and you start paying for it after it gets switched on. I actually ended up pissing off one of the business guys in that company, he had visions of a rack of 100 Mac Pros feverishly calculating away - we did a code review of his algorithm and identified a 100x speedup - now he only needs one Mac Pro for acceptable performance... no more big impressive shiny "supercomputer" to go in his system, he was crushed.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 24 2020, @04:12AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 24 2020, @04:12AM (#1011860)

    Amd64 has a ton more registers than i386, so all other things being equal, will probably be faster (since fewer memory moves). 64 bit also provides a huge address space that makes attacks against ASLR impractical that are practical on 32 bit.