SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Leonardo's 'quick eye' may be key to Mona Lisa's magnetism:
Scientists believe Leonardo da Vinci's super-fast eye may have helped him catch the enigmatic magic of Mona Lisa's smile.
This superhuman trait, which top tennis and baseball players may also share, allowed the Renaissance master to capture accurately minute, fleeting expressions and even birds and dragonflies in flight.
Art historians have long talked of Leonardo's "quick eye", but David S Thaler of Switzerland's University of Basel has tried to gauge it in a new study published Thursday alongside another paper showing how he gave his drawings and paintings uncanny emotional depth.
Professor Thaler's research turns on how Leonardo's eye was so keen he managed to spot that the front and back wings of a dragonfly are out of synch—a discovery which took slow-motion photography to prove four centuries later.
The artist, who lived from 1452 to 1519, sketched how when a dragonfly's front wings are raised, the hind ones are lowered, something that was a blur to Thaler and to his colleagues when they tried to observe the difference themselves.
Thaler told AFP that this gift to see what few humans can may be the secret of Leonardo's most famous painting.
"Mona Lisa's smile is so enigmatic because it represents the moment of breaking into a smile. And Leonardo's quick eye captured that and held it," he said.
(Score: 0, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 24 2020, @03:33PM (2 children)
Why ascribe remarkable superpowers to Leonardo when there's a simpler explanation. He just took a photo if Mona with the digital camera he'd invented to take upskirt photos of ladies climbing the Leaning Tower of Pisa (see page 137 of the Leicester Codex) and copied from that.
(Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Wednesday June 24 2020, @04:17PM (1 child)
You mean here [codex-atlanticus.it]? http://www.codex-atlanticus.it/#/Detail?detail=137 [codex-atlanticus.it]
Or is there some other page 13 I should be referring to?
-- hendrik
(Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Thursday June 25 2020, @03:27AM
I meant, of course, page 137.
Ir did you choose 137 because of its uncanny resemblance to the fine structure constant?
That fooled Eddington, too.