Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Wednesday June 24 2020, @11:33PM   Printer-friendly
from the don't-go-there dept.

Twitter terminates DDoSecrets, falsely claims it may infect visitors

Four days after leak publisher DDoSecrets circulated private documents from more than 200 law enforcement agencies across the United States, Twitter has permanently suspended its account and falsely claimed that the site may infect users with malware.

[...] A Twitter spokesperson confirmed that the company had permanently suspended the DDoSecrets account for violating the social media site's rules barring hacked materials. The spokesperson said the material (1) contained unredacted information that could put people at risk of real-world harm and (2) ran afoul of a policy that forbids the distribution of material that is obtained through technical breaches and hacks, as publishers of DDoSecrets claimed had been done.

DDoSecrets co-founder Emma Best criticized the suspension and noted that the Twitter account for WikiLeaks remains active despite its publishing vast troves of private information resulting from the 2016 hack of the Democratic National Committee and members of the Hillary Clinton campaign. WikiLeaks has also tweeted links to its Vault 7 series, which published details about closely guarded CIA hacking programs.

[...] Twitter users who clicked on tweeted links to the DDoSecrets.com site received a message from Twitter warning, with no evidence, that the site may install malware, steal passwords or other sensitive data, or collect personal data for purposes of sending spam.

This security check from Web security firm Sucuri found no malware on the site, although the firm did note that it was blocked by fellow security firm McAfee.

Previously: "BlueLeaks" Exposes 269 GB of Data from Hundreds of Police Departments and "Fusion Centers"


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday June 25 2020, @01:54AM (2 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday June 25 2020, @01:54AM (#1012250) Journal

    but before he won it was usually easy to tell the difference between news and satire.

    Really?

  • (Score: 5, Touché) by Booga1 on Thursday June 25 2020, @02:02AM (1 child)

    by Booga1 (6333) on Thursday June 25 2020, @02:02AM (#1012256)

    but before he won it was usually easy to tell the difference between news and satire.

    Really?

    See! It's gotten so bad you won't even believe me when I'm talking about my own opinion!

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday June 25 2020, @02:47AM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday June 25 2020, @02:47AM (#1012271) Journal
      Indeed. I doubt your abilities or the news/satire boundary has changed much over Trump's election.