Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Friday June 26 2020, @10:11AM   Printer-friendly
from the don't-have-a-cow,-man. dept.

Devin Nunes can't sue Twitter over statements by fake cow, judge rules:

A judge has ruled that Rep. Devin Nunes has no right to sue Twitter over statements made by a fake Internet cow, someone parodying his mother and a Republican strategist.

Judge John Marshall said in a decision Friday that Twitter was "immune from the defamation claims of" Nunes, R-Tulare, due to federal law that says social media companies are not liable for what people post on their platforms.

Nunes "seeks to have the court treat Twitter as the publisher or speaker of the content provided by others based on its allowing or not allowing certain content to be on its internet platform," Marshall wrote. "The court refuses to do so."

Nunes sued Twitter, the two parody accounts known as Devin Nunes' Cow and Devin Nunes' Mom and strategist Liz Mair in March 2019. He alleged the latter three had defamed him online, ruining his reputation and causing him to win his 2018 election by a narrower margin than normal. He accused Twitter of being negligent for allowing the alleged defamation.

Twitter's lawyers, in their motion to dismiss the suit, argued that Twitter was immune from the lawsuit due to federal law. The law, known as Section 230, says that social media companies like Twitter are not liable for what third parties post on their platform. The only exception is if Twitter personally helped develop or create the content. Both Twitter and Nunes agreed the company did not do that in this case.

Also at Ars Technica.

Previously:
(2019-03-22) "He's Literally Suing an Imaginary Cow": Late-Night Hosts Mock Rep. Devin Nunes


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 26 2020, @01:54PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 26 2020, @01:54PM (#1012834)

    When does Twitters curation of content cross the line of good faith?

    Personally, if they want to be a platform then they should have a TOS that is fair and equally enforced. I think the law should change to state as much and if there is unfair or unequal enforced TOS then they lose those protections and liable for suit.

    It's great that we had a law that protected those tech companies and allowed them to become giants. It's not so great that as soon as they became giants and the most profitable companies in the world that they use their position to shit no people they don't like.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   0  
       Troll=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   0  
  • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 27 2020, @03:43AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 27 2020, @03:43AM (#1013124)

    Make them adopt CoCs too.