Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday June 27 2020, @06:06AM   Printer-friendly
from the wheels-of-'justice'-grinding-away dept.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2020/06/26/free-speech-in-the-us-empire-is-as-illusory-as-free-range-eggs/

In what Shadowproof‘s Kevin Gosztola calls “a not-so-subtle effort to criminalize the journalism of an adversarial media organization that the United States has spent the last decade working to destroy,” WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been hit with another superseding indictment [PDF] by the US Department of Justice.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/wikileaks-founder-charged-superseding-indictment

The new indictment does not add additional counts to the prior 18-count superseding indictment returned against Assange in May 2019. It does, however, broaden the scope of the conspiracy surrounding alleged computer intrusions with which Assange was previously charged. According to the charging document, Assange and others at WikiLeaks recruited and agreed with hackers to commit computer intrusions to benefit WikiLeaks.

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/06/25/assa-j25.html

Significantly, none of the events was held in the United States, but are cited as evidence of intent, or conspiracy, to violate American laws. This is in line with the unprecedented assertion of extraterritorial jurisdiction on which the entire indictment is based. The Justice Department is essentially arguing that domestic US laws apply to all individuals and gatherings in every part of the world.

Unlike the previous indictment, the latest US charge sheet condemns Assange over WikiLeaks’ role in assisting Edward Snowden to travel from Hong Kong to Russia in 2013, where he successfully obtained political asylum. Snowden is a multi-award winning whistleblower, who exposed illegal global surveillance operations by the US National Security Agency.

The document complains that WikiLeaks publicised its role in defending Snowden to display its commitment to whistleblower protection. This alone brands the new indictment as a further assault on fundamental journalistic practices.

A substantial part of the new material in the indictment appears to be based on testimony and information provided by two acknowledged informants of the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI): Sigurdur “Siggi” Thordarson, named in the document as “Teenager,” and Hector Monsegur, known by the online pseudonym “Sabu.”


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 27 2020, @11:41AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 27 2020, @11:41AM (#1013205)

    I think they plagiarized that from a recent PETA press release:

    "We reiterate our demand to end the torture and medical neglect of Julian Assange's cat. PETA states that, in view of Mr Assange's cat being a victim of psychological torture, Assange's extradition to the USA would be warranted under international animal rights law. PETA emphasises that withholding appropriate litterbox changes can itself amount to torture, and under the Convention Against Torture, those acting in guardianship capacities can be held complicit and accountable not only for perpetration of torture, but for their silent acquiescence and consent. As veterinarians, we have a professional and ethical duty to speak out against, report, and stop torture. Silence on Mr Assange's cat's torture might well facilitate its death. The silence must be broken. Now. Please join us!"

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Troll=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1