Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday June 27 2020, @10:56AM   Printer-friendly
from the what's-the-matter? dept.

Case for axion origin of dark matter gains traction:

The existence of dark matter has been confirmed by several independent observations, but its true identity remains a mystery. According to this study, axion velocity provides a key insight into the dark matter puzzle. Previous research efforts have successfully accounted for the abundance of dark matter in the universe; however certain factors, such as the underproduction of axions with stronger ordinary matter interactions, remained unexplored.

By assigning a nonzero initial velocity to the axion field, the team discovered a mechanism—termed kinetic misalignment—producing far more axions in the early universe than conventional mechanisms. The motion, generated by breaking of the axion shift symmetry, significantly modifies the conventional computation of the axion dark matter abundance. Additionally, these dynamics allow axion dark matter to react more strongly with ordinary matter, exceeding the prediction of the conventional misalignment mechanism.

"The extensive literature on the axion was built upon the assumption that the axion field is initially static in the early universe," stated Keisuke Harigaya of the Institute for Advanced Study. "Instead, we discovered that the axion field may be initially dynamic as a consequence of theories of quantum gravity with axions."

Journal Reference:
Raymond T. Co, Lawrence J. Hall, Keisuke Harigaya. Axion Kinetic Misalignment Mechanism [open], Physical Review Letters (DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.251802)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by maxwell demon on Saturday June 27 2020, @01:10PM (1 child)

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Saturday June 27 2020, @01:10PM (#1013232) Journal

    From a (very) quick look into the actual article, it seems that “velocity” here refers to the rate of change of field strength. “Static” then means the field does not change with time.

    Relativity may affect how fast you perceive a field changing, but not whether it changes at all (well, there is an intermixing between spatial and temporal change, but I guess the static scenario also involved a spatially constant field)

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Sunday June 28 2020, @01:54AM

    by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Sunday June 28 2020, @01:54AM (#1013514) Homepage Journal

    That make sense. Thank you.