Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday July 01 2020, @08:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the security-for-whom? dept.

China Enacts Security Law, Asserting Control Over Hong Kong

Beijing's top legislative body has unanimously passed a sweeping national security law for Hong Kong, a controversial move that could effectively criminalize most dissent in the city and risks widening the rift between China and western countries who have criticized the law.

The news was first reported by local Hong Kong media: cable televsion station NOWNews; the city's public broadcaster; and a slew of newspapers, including Wei Wen Po and Ta Kung Pao, two pro-Beijing outlets which often signal official Chinese policy.

Hours later, the official Chinese news agency Xinhua reported President Xi Jinping had already signed the measure into law. Xinhua said it will be incorporated into Hong Kong's Basic Law, the city's mini-constitution, and become effective Wednesday, the anniversary of Hong Kong's 1997 handover from British to Chinese Rule.

Hong Kong security law: Anger as China's Xi signs legislation

One key pro-democracy group said it was now ceasing all operations. Demosisto announced the move on Facebook after Joshua Wong, one of Hong Kong's most prominent activists, said he was leaving the group, which he had spearheaded.

[...] Demosisto said several members had asked to be delisted and it had decided to "dissolve and stop all meetings". It said that the fight against "totalitarian oppression" would have to continue in a "more flexible manner". Joshua Wong said the law marked "the end of Hong Kong that the world knew before".

Also at NYT, Reuters, and Hong Kong Free Press.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by looorg on Wednesday July 01 2020, @01:09PM (5 children)

    by looorg (578) on Wednesday July 01 2020, @01:09PM (#1014995)

    On the other hand there is a lot of things that they have not done which they could have done if they are just on some kind of deal breaking spree. There still isn't Chinese-style socialism there -- yet. But it's going to come. The goal is to make it a part of mainland China. That is inevitable. Is that going to be better/less painful or whatever you want to call it if it happens "now" or in another 20:ish years. Better with a gradual transition then to have it all happen at the flip of a switch.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by khallow on Wednesday July 01 2020, @01:16PM (4 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday July 01 2020, @01:16PM (#1014999) Journal

    On the other hand there is a lot of things that they have not done yet which they could have done if they are just on some kind of deal breaking spree.

    FTFY. It's nice that there's constraints on China's behavior in this matter, but we need to keep in mind that they did break the deal even if they could have broken it more than they did.

    The goal is to make it a part of mainland China. That is inevitable.

    China could do nothing for another three decades and the inevitable would still happen. What's the rush?

    Is that going to be better/less painful or whatever you want to call it if it happens "now" or in another 20:ish years.

    Less pain if it happens later. Hong Kong is in a better situation now than it will be as another city in China. So the more that day of transition is put off, the better.

    • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Wednesday July 01 2020, @09:01PM (3 children)

      by Grishnakh (2831) on Wednesday July 01 2020, @09:01PM (#1015147)

      As I understand it, HK really doesn't have much to offer economically, except that it was a gateway to China's economy so it became a big financial and trade center. It was never any kind of manufacturing hub (though Shenzen, almost next door to it, is). So the problem is that if they just get absorbed into China, they're no longer attractive as a financial/trade hub, so the city is probably going to implode, or at least stagnate, economically.

      • (Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Wednesday July 01 2020, @10:50PM (1 child)

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday July 01 2020, @10:50PM (#1015180) Journal

        As I understand it, HK really doesn't have much to offer economically, except that it was a gateway to China's economy so it became a big financial and trade center.

        Which turned out to be quite a lot actually.

        So the problem is that if they just get absorbed into China, they're no longer attractive as a financial/trade hub, so the city is probably going to implode, or at least stagnate, economically.

        Why is that of value to China?

        • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Thursday July 02 2020, @07:26PM

          by Grishnakh (2831) on Thursday July 02 2020, @07:26PM (#1015498)

          Which turned out to be quite a lot actually.

          Yes, it *was* a lot. It only worked because of HK's unique relationship with China and the fact that it wasn't actually part of China (and later, was "sorta" part of China, but not really, with an autonomous government). This move ends this. HK is now just another Chinese city, so these special features are gone, meaning HK no longer has a reason to exist.

          Why is that of value to China?

          Well, it was of value to HK and its citizens and its economy, and presumably HK did remit some kind of tax revenues to China, as well as enabling trade. I fail to see how HK was anything other than a large economic plus for China. That's all going away now.

      • (Score: 2) by Mykl on Thursday July 02 2020, @01:36AM

        by Mykl (1112) on Thursday July 02 2020, @01:36AM (#1015236)

        Agree. China is about to kill a golden goose.