Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Thursday July 02 2020, @04:30PM   Printer-friendly
from the where-the-mother-lode-gives-birth? dept.

Geologists identify deep-earth structures that may signal hidden metal lodes

If the world is to maintain a sustainable economy and fend off the worst effects of climate change, at least one industry will soon have to ramp up dramatically: the mining of metals needed to create a vast infrastructure for renewable power generation, storage, transmission and usage. The problem is, demand for such metals is likely to far outstrip currently both known deposits and the existing technology used to find more ore bodies.

Now, in a new study, scientists have discovered previously unrecognized structural lines 100 miles or more down in the earth that appear to signal the locations of giant deposits of copper, lead, zinc and other vital metals lying close enough to the surface to be mined, but too far down to be found using current exploration methods. The discovery could greatly narrow down search areas, and reduce the footprint of future mines, the authors say. The study appears this week in the journal Nature Geoscience.

[...] The study found that 85 percent of all known base-metal deposits hosted in sediments-and 100 percent of all "giant" deposits (those holding more than 10 million tons of metal)-lie above deeply buried lines girdling the planet that mark the edges of ancient continents. Specifically, the deposits lie along boundaries where the earth's lithosphere-the rigid outermost cladding of the planet, comprising the crust and upper mantle-thins out to about 170 kilometers below the surface.

Up to now, all such deposits have been found pretty much at the surface, and their locations have seemed to be somewhat random. Most discoveries have been made basically by geologists combing the ground and whacking at rocks with hammers. Geophysical exploration methods using gravity and other parameters to find buried ore bodies have entered in recent decades, but the results have been underwhelming. The new study presents geologists with a new, high-tech treasure map telling them where to look.

Journal Reference:
Mark J. Hoggard, Karol Czarnota, Fred D. Richards, et al. Global distribution of sediment-hosted metals controlled by craton edge stability, Nature Geoscience (DOI: 10.1038/s41561-020-0593-2)

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Friday July 03 2020, @02:07PM (6 children)

    by Immerman (3985) on Friday July 03 2020, @02:07PM (#1015755)

    > If it takes a while to transport a drill bit down, then why not transport numerous bits down so that you have a pool of bits to use when the current one fails?

    Where are you going to put them? The hole is the same size as the drill bit, and to use a new bit you must first remove the old bit. I suppose you could potentially design a "stacked bit" where you could disengage the dull front bit to let the next bit take over - but that next bit is going to have to either drill through the first one, or back up and drill around it.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday July 04 2020, @03:23AM (5 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday July 04 2020, @03:23AM (#1015990) Journal

    Where are you going to put them? The hole is the same size as the drill bit

    Well, sounds like we have another big challenge then. While it might be possible to assemble a drill bit wider than the hole it came in under the high performance conditions of 100 km down, we can also drill parallel holes and store stuff in them as well as use that for the space needed to swap out drills and such.

    All I can say though is that if you're pulling drill bits all the way to the surface to replace them, then you're doing it wrong.

    • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Saturday July 04 2020, @09:23PM (4 children)

      by Immerman (3985) on Saturday July 04 2020, @09:23PM (#1016255)

      >All I can say though is that if you're pulling drill bits all the way to the surface to replace them, then you're doing it wrong.

      If you're trying to dig a 100mile borehole, probably not. But if you're drilling, there's not a whole lot of other options - that shaft is transmitting a lot of torque, you'll be lucky if you can use a stack of bits that can break away on demand (rather than breaking away whenever you hit something hard). You're almost certainly not going to be able to park a bunch of replacement bits in a side hole and re-connect to them when needed - not in a semi-liquid environment of packed with mud and shattered stone.

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday July 05 2020, @01:51AM (3 children)

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday July 05 2020, @01:51AM (#1016347) Journal

        that shaft is transmitting a lot of torque

        Why would it be transmitting any torque at all? The drill bit itself doesn't need to generate net torque. And the force needed to drill can be generated locally (rather than mechanically through a rotating shaft) meaning most of the pipe wouldn't be experiencing any force or torque from the drilling itself. And if you made most of the pipe near zero buoyancy, any segment wouldn't generate much force on the rest of the pipe.

        you'll be lucky if you can use a stack of bits that can break away on demand (rather than breaking away whenever you hit something hard). You're almost certainly not going to be able to park a bunch of replacement bits in a side hole and re-connect to them when needed - not in a semi-liquid environment of packed with mud and shattered stone.

        Rather than be an impossible thing, this sounds like a way to implement things. The semi-liquid environment already moves things around. Stack of bits doesn't sound workable, but replacing a drill bit, by pulling back the assembly and replacing it, does sound to me like it would be viable.

        My thinking is that in the long run, many decades down the road, one could create huge shafts and complex transportation systems capable of managing multiple drills at the same time at various levels of the system (to widen parts of the system or drill deeper), and vast underground infrastructure to mine these alleged deposits. And all of this could be a natural incremental improvement of technology we could deploy in the near future (well, have to make the stuff first).

        • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Sunday July 05 2020, @02:48AM (2 children)

          by Immerman (3985) on Sunday July 05 2020, @02:48AM (#1016351)

          Net torque is what lets the bit cut through rock - without it it your hole doesn't get any deeper.

          Semi-liquid is fine - pieces of shattered stone are NOT. And inevitable.

          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday July 05 2020, @03:51AM (1 child)

            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday July 05 2020, @03:51AM (#1016377) Journal

            Net torque is what lets the bit cut through rock

            Torque not net torque is what lets the bit cut rock. You can, for example have two or more drill bits rotating counter to each other so that they are cutting rock, but generating zero net torque in the process.

            Semi-liquid is fine - pieces of shattered stone are NOT.

            Because?

            • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Sunday July 05 2020, @01:31PM

              by Immerman (3985) on Sunday July 05 2020, @01:31PM (#1016498)

              Because you're not plugging a connection together with a bunch of gravel in the way.