Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Sunday July 05 2020, @05:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the Broken-As-Designed? dept.

YouTube Hit With Class Action Lawsuit Over Copyright Enforcement, Repeat Infringer Policy * TorrentFreak

For many years, Google-owned YouTube has been wrestling with the vast amounts of copyright-infringing content being uploaded by users to its platform.

The challenge is met by YouTube by taking down content for which copyright holders file a legitimate infringement complaint under the DMCA. It also operates a voluntary system known as Content ID, which allows larger rightsholders to settle disputes by either blocking contentious content automatically at the point of upload or monetizing it to generate revenue.

A class action lawsuit filed Thursday in a California court by Grammy award-winning musician Maria Schneider tears apart YouTube’s efforts. It claims that the video-sharing platform fails on a grand scale to protect “ordinary creators” who are “denied any meaningful opportunity to prevent YouTube’s public display of works that infringe their copyrights — no matter how many times their works have previously been pirated on the platform.”

The 44-page complaint leaves no stone unturned, slamming YouTube as a platform designed from the ground up to draw in users with the lure of a “vast library” of pirated content and incentivizing the posting of even more material. YouTube then reaps the rewards via advertising revenue and exploitation of personal data at the expense of copyright holders who never gave permission for their work to be uploaded.

The lawsuit further criticizes YouTube for not only preventing smaller artists from accessing its Content ID system but denouncing the fingerprinting system itself, describing it as a mechanism used by YouTube to prevent known infringing users from being terminated from the site under the repeat infringer requirements of the DMCA.

The full complaint can be obtained here (pdf)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by inertnet on Sunday July 05 2020, @10:48PM (2 children)

    by inertnet (4071) on Sunday July 05 2020, @10:48PM (#1016690) Journal

    or monetizing it to generate revenue

    Why not just leave the copyrighted stuff online and divert some revenue to the copyright holder? Youtube would need to inform the uploader if that happens, who can then file a complaint if s/he doesn't agree. This could lead to abuse by copyright claimants, but that could be countered by a "three strikes you're out" policy for bad claims.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by leon_the_cat on Sunday July 05 2020, @10:57PM

    by leon_the_cat (10052) on Sunday July 05 2020, @10:57PM (#1016697) Journal

    they already do this.

  • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Monday July 06 2020, @10:24AM

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Monday July 06 2020, @10:24AM (#1016919) Journal

    Why not just leave the copyrighted stuff online and divert some revenue to the copyright holder?

    What do you think “monetizing it to generate revenue” means?

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.