SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the prepare-yourself-for-further-tuition-increases dept.
Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:
International students will be forced to leave the U.S. or transfer to another college if their schools offer classes entirely online this fall, under new guidelines issued Monday by federal immigration authorities.
The guidelines, issued by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, provide additional pressure for universities to reopen even amid growing concerns about the recent spread of COVID-19 among young adults. Colleges received the guidance the same day that some institutions, including Harvard University, announced that all instruction will be offered remotely.
[...] Those attending schools that are staying online must "depart the country or take other measures, such as transferring to a school with in-person instruction," according to the guidance.
[...] Of particular concern is a stipulation saying students won't be exempt from the rules even if an outbreak forces their schools online during the fall term. It's unclear what would happen if a student ended up in that scenario but faced travel restrictions from their home country, said Terry Hartle, the council's senior vice president.
[...] Colleges across the U.S. were already expecting sharp decreases in international enrollment this fall, but losing all international students could be disastrous for some. Many depend on tuition revenue from international students, who typically pay higher tuition rates. Last year, universities in the U.S. attracted nearly 1.1 million students from abroad.
[...] The administration has long sought deep cuts to legal immigration, but the goal was elusive before the coronavirus.
The BBC notes:
[...] Large numbers of foreign students travel to the US to study every year and are a significant source of revenue for universities as many pay full tuition.
[...] Harvard has announced all course instruction will be delivered online when students return for the new academic year, including those living at the university.
[...] Monday's announcement said foreign students who remain in the US while enrolled in online courses and fail to switch to in-person courses could face "immigration consequences including, but not limited to, the initiation of removal proceedings".
The rule applies to holders of F-1 and M-1 visas, which are for academic and vocational students. The State Department issued 388,839 F visas and 9,518 M visas in the fiscal year 2019, according to the agency's data.
According to the US Commerce Department, international students contributed $45 billion (£36 billion) to the country's economy in 2018.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday July 08 2020, @01:59PM
I guess my point is: if you're "demanding" something, you've got no legal ground to stand on, you can "demand" until the lawyers get bored and leave - it won't change a thing. I actually love watching people "demand" things that aren't going to happen, and I am disinclined to acquiesce to a "demand" which has no basis in requirement.
You can "respectfully request" a refund in consideration for the extenuating circumstances, circumstances which you are prepared to let pass discretely if the hotelier is reasonable in their response to your request. There's a big difference, in my mind at least. Also, in the era of Yelp et. al. it's a lot easier to "get loud" about a bad experience. My mother runs a VRBO, occupancy rates in her area are 100% determined by reviews, even one less than 5 star review will dramatically reduce bookings. And, while the system is still possible to shill and fill with 5 stars, they do make it difficult.
Again, depends on context. Small motels with low occupancy rates, cheaper operations in high demand areas that don't give a flip about one patron going hysterical, they'll still stiff a request for refund even less than an hour after payment, even if the door to the room was never opened - "so sue the owner if you like." (Personal experience.)
🌻🌻 [google.com]