Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday July 09 2020, @09:51AM   Printer-friendly
from the now-make-it-out-of-graphene dept.

Shock-dissipating fractal cubes could forge high-tech armor:

Tiny, 3-D printed cubes of plastic, with intricate fractal voids built into them, have proven to be effective at dissipating shockwaves, potentially leading to new types of lightweight armor and structural materials effective against explosions and impacts.

"The goal of the work is to manipulate the wave interactions resulting from a shockwave," said Dana Dattelbaum, a scientist at Los Alamos National Laboratory and lead author on a paper to appear in the journal AIP Advances. "The guiding principles for how to do so have not been well defined, certainly less so compared to mechanical deformation of additively manufactured materials. We're defining those principles, due to advanced, mesoscale manufacturing and design."

Shockwave dispersing materials that take advantage of voids have been developed in the past, but they typically involved random distributions discovered through trial and error. Others have used layers to reverberate shock and release waves. Precisely controlling the location of holes in a material allows the researchers to design, model and test structures that perform as designed, in a reproducible way.

The researchers tested their fractal structures by firing an impactor into them at approximately 670 miles per hour. The structured cubes dissipated the shocks five times better than solid cubes of the same material.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Thursday July 09 2020, @01:12PM (5 children)

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Thursday July 09 2020, @01:12PM (#1018638) Journal

    Dispersing the shockwaves from the projectile is key to armoring against higher calibers. I saw a video recently of an experimental bulletproof vest rated to stop a 50-cal bullet; the vest prevented the bullet from penetrating, but the shockwave still would have snapped the wearer's spine and probably killed him from internal bleeding from ruptured organs.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday July 09 2020, @02:55PM (4 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday July 09 2020, @02:55PM (#1018672) Journal

    Was that a .50 M2 machine gun (Ma Deuce) or was it a .50 muzzle loader? Your description sounds more like the former, and I don't think there is going to be a human portable armor that will deflect that round for a long, long time. The Twelfth of Never, maybe.

    • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Thursday July 09 2020, @03:45PM (1 child)

      by Phoenix666 (552) on Thursday July 09 2020, @03:45PM (#1018685) Journal

      The former. This [youtube.com] is the guy I watched. The vest stopped the round, but seemingly at the cost of mulching the target's bones and organs.

      On the bright side, there was another guy testing the idea of taking cover behind normal-sized trees and the ballistics gel dummy was quite safe there. It took a decent number of 50 cal rounds before he could pound/blast through the trunk and get the target.

      --
      Washington DC delenda est.
      • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Friday July 10 2020, @12:37AM

        by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday July 10 2020, @12:37AM (#1018904) Journal

        Yeah, oww! The thing about a Ma Deuce, you have hundreds, or even thousands, of those projectiles flying around. Take two or more of them, and set them up to catch your targets in a crossfire. They'll tear even most armored vehicles to shreds, given a few minutes. Put AP rounds in them, and it won't take minutes, but seconds.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 09 2020, @08:12PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 09 2020, @08:12PM (#1018799)

      .50-140-600 Sharps? I just love how "high-caliber" is confused with "high-power". High caliber is just large bore. Power is mass x velocity times the Constant of the target holding still.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 10 2020, @12:01AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 10 2020, @12:01AM (#1018892)

        While the .50 caliber was being developed, some German T Gewehr 1918 anti-tank rifles and ammunition were seized. The German rounds had a muzzle velocity of 2,700 ft/s (820 m/s), an 800 gr (52 g) bullet, and could penetrate armor 1 in (25 mm) thick at a range of 250 yd (230 m).[16] Winchester improved the .50 caliber round to have similar performance. Ultimately, the muzzle velocity was 2,750 ft/s (840 m/s)

        17.5kJ